SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (146941)5/6/2002 3:41:11 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575465
 
Russian Oil and U.S. Security

By LEON ARON

WASHINGTON — With
another oil shock looming
thanks to Saddam Hussein's
decision to suspend Iraq's oil
exports and to the turmoil in
Venezuela — not to mention
Saudi Arabia's recent, brief
waving of "the oil weapon" —
the need to broaden the range of
America's energy sources has
become urgent.

One underappreciated source is obvious: Russian oil.
Russia is the world's single largest non-OPEC oil
exporter, with 10 percent of currently known oil reserves
and 9 percent of world output. Yet Russia's irregular,
"spot market" deliveries to the United States are a fraction
of 1 percent of American imports. By contrast, Iraq's share
of American imports last year was 7 percent; between
them, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Iraq, OPEC members
all, accounted for 34 percent.

To be less dependent on any one of these sources would
help stabilize oil prices and lessen American vulnerability
to political blackmail. Americans are not in the habit of
looking to Russia for help in enhancing our security. But
Russia has been transformed in the last 10 years, and
Vladimir Putin's solidarity with the United States since
Sept. 11 has sealed that transformation.

A decade of privatization of the Russian oil sector has
been a success. Since the mid-1990's, Russia's "big six"
oil companies have invested an estimated $5 billion in
exploration, equipment and rehabilitation of oil fields
damaged by Soviet policies. Twenty years ago most
experts thought Russia would have to import oil. Instead,
it has increased production by 15 percent in the past two
years and is poised to pump 11 percent more this year than
last. Last February, Russia pumped more oil than Saudi
Arabia.

At the same time, Russia has striven to create the
conditions for private business — domestic and foreign
— to thrive. From demilitarization, privatization and
de-Bolshevization in the Yeltsin era to last year's flat 13
percent income tax and other pro-business measures,
Russia has progressed enormously since the end of the
cold war.

Moscow has also guarded its freedom to maneuver in oil
politics. Through the fall of 2001, Russia resisted OPEC's
demand to reduce exports, thus shielding the American
and European economies from higher energy costs. The
other two leading independent exporters, Mexico and
Norway, followed suit. Moscow eventually said it would
cut exports by 150,000 barrels a day — but went on to
increase production, showing that it remains fully
independent of OPEC.

Russia is awash in oil, and while Russian companies are
busily acquiring assets in Europe, the ultimate prize is
America. President Vladimir Putin is likely to raise the
issue of Russian oil with President Bush at the summit on
May 23 to 25 in Moscow and St. Petersburg.

The obstacles to Russian oil exports to America,
however, are formidable. The first problem is transport.
Russia's major oil fields are thousands of miles away
from the deep-water ports that oil tankers require.

Getting Russian oil to America's West Coast from
terminals on the Pacific Ocean in the Russian Far East —
the shortest route — will require spending billions to put
in pipelines from western Siberian oilfields and to
develop the rich Magadan and Chukotka shelves in the
extreme Northeast. Although the Russians can tackle parts
of the problem themselves — the state pipeline company
Transneft announced last month that it would invest $5
billion in a pipeline from southern Siberia to the Sea of
Japan — drilling in eastern Russia and transporting the oil
will not be possible without outside investment.

Partnership with American oil companies is critical.
There have been some joint ventures in recent years: the
acquisition in 2000 of Getty Petroleum Marketing by
Russia's largest oil company, Lukoil, for example, or
Exxon's $4 billion partnership last year with Russian,
Japanese and Indian companies for deep-sea drilling
around Sakhalin. But American companies remain wary of
getting too close to Russian counterparts that only recently
abandoned some very unscrupulous business practices,
including strong-arming minority shareholders and
wresting some of the richest oil fields away from foreign
co-owners through corporate shenanigans.

American oil companies are perfectly able to gather
information and make their own investment decisions.
Nonetheless, given our need to broaden our range of
energy sources for security reasons, Congress and the
White House ought to collaborate on legislation giving tax
incentives to American oil companies investing in Russia.
In exchange, President Bush should seek the Russian
government's commitment to enforcing fairness,
transparency and predictability in regulation, taxation and
repatriation of profits.

The Bush administration should also consider applying
some pressure to the European Union. The union's current
rule — no more than 30 percent of total E.U. imports can
come from a single outside source — greatly hampers
Russia's ability to bring more oil to the world market.

Even if the Russians were to succeed in getting the
capability to reach American oil buyers, there should be
no illusions: the displacement of the Persian Gulf in
America's energy market is going to be neither total nor
swift. Yet a sizable Russian presence in American
markets over the next decade will be enough to provide a
critical safety margin for energy prices and increase
stability in American oil supplies.

Leon Aron, director of Russian studies at the American
Enterprise Institute, is author of a biography of Boris
Yeltsin.

nytimes.com



To: TimF who wrote (146941)5/6/2002 4:34:34 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575465
 
...A U.S. diplomat in Jakarta told me she had just visited the town of Malang, in East Java, and had seen an Indonesian boy there wearing an Osama bin Laden T-shirt and a New York Yankees cap. So all isn't lost. But we must make
sure that he grows into the hat, not the T-shirt.

nytimes.com;

Tim, this stuff is disturbing. There is so much distrust and misunderstanding on both sides. Its not surprising that Buffet thinks there will be a nuke strike in the US.

ted



To: TimF who wrote (146941)5/7/2002 1:29:33 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575465
 
Anyone else pick up some WCOM besides me......its up 10% today........or $.20. Obviously, 10% sounds a lot better. <g>

ted