Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (85168)	5/6/2002 9:43:39 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116823

Will Barrick cover a short, 23 million ounces of gold? or Best to ask if its "in the cards" and if so, "Could Barrick cover short position of 23 million ounces even if it wanted to?" groups.yahoo.com * IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION * Please Read The Following This above article is the "same" as Message from long-gone Derivatives may be the real bomb Barrick Gold answers queries about 'mark to market' By Thom Calandra, CBS.MarketWatch.com BUT, Differences exist in these two "cut & paste" of the total text, meaning, for sure whatever text is present using the url is "it" BUT, why the difference or, as Silicon Investor instructed me in an e-mail "... supply only an introduction or summary with url..." which would solve the issue we now have, meaning, "Reader Beware" of full cut(s) & paste(s) but then, as i mentioned, few read these posts that "wallpaper" this thread since once one does that View Next 10 and get these posts that contain not an opinion or summary of a long article, but the whole page after pages of text to fill a small book, that many do as i do and simply move on to the next post as a reflex that includes NOT reading this huge cut & paste, like a reflex to push away someone pushing something at you without any introduction. So guess what, after my visit to yahoo gata groups and seeing above article i wondered why this thread did not have this important info posted. So i took the time to re-look at this thread a second time, and golly gee, then it was, that post i "next'ed" as a reflex to those other off-topic and stupid-topic wall-pappered posts. But it was a good one, but got run-over and ignored using that reverse hick-hiker problem where 1 in a 1,000 you pick up to give a ride is a bad guy gonna do you harm, and them 999 wallpaper posts prevented this good "one." ok, BUT these them there differences might "tell a story" as in, "what changed" might give insight. yes ak