Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (12385)	5/7/2002 6:19:50 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I was arguing that there does seem to be a remote connection with Poets suspension and the other "current events" on SI that she is involved with. I do not know exactly why she was singled out to receive a sanction at this point. I do not argue that a violation such as this is sanctionable. In fact, I stated that I had fanticised about doing the same thing and would not consider it wrong if I were punished for such an offense. I am aware that threats were made by CH to act in certain ways that would cause harm to Poet if he did not get his way. This would include revealing things that he knew about her that she had asked to be kept quiet. Is this a result of that??? don't know for sure. I am also aware that Poet has been raising some issues that could be putting the SI Admin in an uncomfortable position related to TOU Administration. Why do you think at this particular point in time she has been singled out for this suspension. Do you think there could be a remote connection? I do.