Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Israel who wrote (63284)	5/7/2002 6:13:05 PM
From: KevinMark	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99280

COT's have already started covering, yet there are still so many doom and gloomers still around it's amazing.

To: Israel who wrote (63284)	5/7/2002 6:21:23 PM
From: nsumir81	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 99280

LOL DOUBLE=3000 ish BUT (STILL) not a bull mkt! What gives?

To: Israel who wrote (63284)	5/7/2002 6:30:15 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

yes agreed(and he stood up to NOT saying what Insana was pressing him to say)---but he gave a 2week to 2month time frame for capitulation earlier and at end he was reduced to saying soon. Plus, from other interviews, he sees that double as a great swing trade but NOT a return to a tech Bull Market. InSana kept trying to have his words get glued to his constant refrain of a new Secular Tech Bull Market. Which Biggs does NOT believe in, but Insana bombed him so many times with the Secular phrase one could have been deceived into thinking Biggs was saying, "we have a capitulation and then a new Secular tech Bull Market", which he has never said, and does not believe. I am pleased the Barton didn't capitulate to Insana, but it was so blatant that Insana was working him over to get this spin. That's my not so objective view as those CNBC interviews churn my gut:) Max P.S. i am BTW anxiously waiting to BUY that capitulation:)