Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (46876)	5/8/2002 4:22:09 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I was not involved in Poet's suspension. I'm not totally convinced either. Jeff's statement was noted. And I have since surfaced evidence casting some doubt on the matter that I forwarded to E. She is actually more favorable than you believe. BUT if you think the recent incident is the only matter involved, you are badly deluding yourself. Go back and re-read my previous post. THAT'S where the problem is likely to lie. And would whether the latest incident had happened or not. But as I said, I intend no involvement, so I'm going to drop the matter now. When E gets back, you and she can work on it. But those conditions referred to have to be met.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (46876)	5/12/2002 7:57:55 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You have described me as "continually calling you a liar." I've been away, but assume you are talking about the issue of how Poet got suspended? Would you show me these posts? These are my posts on the subject. I describe you, accurately, as "mischaracterizing" my posts. I wonder if that is what you are describing as "continually calling [you] a liar." Is it? Here are the posts at issue, I believe. Where do I "continually call [you] a liar?" Message 17456466 Message 17456451 Message 17437604 Message 17437289