Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (47002)	5/12/2002 8:55:45 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

After I told you straight out that I had nothing to do with Poet's suspension, you continued to disbelieve my denials. For example, you questioned whether I had done it through another account, or through another person. You challenged me to ask Jeff whether I could have done it some other way. That clearly was a statement that you did not believe me. I consider that calling me a liar. Also, after you said that I knew about Poet's other accounts, I told you that I didn't. But you continued to claim that I did. That, too, is calling me a liar. There is no need to dredge up past posts. You and I both know that you did these things. E, you have shown, sadly, that you are so prejudiced against me that there is no point in our trying to communicate on the issue. No matter what I say, I can have no confidence that you will believe me. That being the case, there's no point that I can see in my trying to say anything to you. Laz may feel that you have some ability or willingness to act as an "advocate" for me, but that is obviously not the case. So when Poet gets back from suspension I will do what I can to mend my fences directly with her. Whatever Laz may say or feel, I see neither a need nor a reason to look to you for any intermediary role.