Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (85261)	5/8/2002 10:20:33 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116822

What the hell is your "she's also been wrong" comeback Your post was about lying s.o.b. conflict of interest analysts working for investment banking firms and writing supportive reports regardless of facts to contrary that might make a "new client" a bad stock investment recommendation.. I posted about the Garz getting pressured to leave her high profile A/Express job because she wouldn't rubber stamp a banking investment relationship client she'd been assigned to analyze. I wrote this was admirable. I wrote that I admired her. I wrote that no-one could remember or wanted to remember her name in light of today's SEC developments. She left A/E under her own steam, and took a lot of A/E clients with her. That took career guts and personal fortitude. Who gives a rat's ass on the GPM thread about if Garz has a 100% accurate track record in market calls? Or, as my g'ma usta say: what does that have to do with the price of tea in China?? You brought up the sleezy analyst topic, ----I posted on topic, -------and you want to put Garz down because she's not 100% accurate in her market calls??? What's with that?. C'mon, Richard...cut GPM'ers some slack... You embarrassed because you couldn't remember Garz's name?? Garz needs to be applauded for not playing the immoral analyst games and for going independent, before even the "accountants" found it the post Enron fashion to do so.... She's not the person consulting her legal beagles for new policy advice and malpractice insurance referrals after the SEC approved lingo re: analysts and I/Banking regulatory re-write today...even with the huge hole allowing for deferred compensation/aka "profit sharing" at year end for analysts and in house I/B success stories...