Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (15525)	5/9/2002 2:50:45 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

I don't know who Clausewitz is and he may have said something to the effect of what you say. But in this case Arafat is very visible in the world community. He has met with world leaders including Shimon Peres and has been the rceipient of the Nobel Peace prize. Hence dealing with him is different from dealing with cavemen. With cavemen you just bomb and blast your way through and do not have to care for civilians since they do not have popular support amongst the civilians and do not live in their midst. Arafat's case is the opposite side of the coin. As I said that if he is inciting/acquiescing to terrorism, then he is answerable to the world and will be pressured by the world community to cease and desist from such acts. But surely the world i salso not going to tolerate Ariel trying to settle a personal situation he has with Arafat. If that is the case then the world will look to two entirely diferrent leaders from both the Palestenian and Israeli side