SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/21/2002 9:22:19 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Despite a Year of Upheavals, Economic Optimism Is High

By DAVID LEONHARDT
The New York Times
May 21, 2002

With a stock market bust, a recession that wiped out almost two million jobs and the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, Americans would seem to have plenty of reasons to worry about a diminished future. Instead, they have emerged from the nation's recent turmoil far more optimistic than after any other economic downturn in a generation.

In place of the economic malaise that generally plagued the public in the 1970's and from the late 1980's through the early 1990's, polls show that by wide margins Americans now say that the coming years will be prosperous and that today's children will live better than their parents.

In a survey by the University of Michigan, for example, half of those polled said that they believe that the next five years will bring continuous good times, more than did at any point from 1970 to 1996 and up from a low of 8 percent in 1975.

Monthly measures of consumer confidence, much higher than they were at the end of other downturns in recent decades, suggest that people now see a recession as merely a hiccup. On Friday, Michigan's widely followed index of consumer sentiment moved up in a sign that many people believe that the country's recent economic troubles are fading.

"I think back to how it felt in the early 90's, and it was much different," said Arla Lerman, 43, a real estate broker who lives in Evanston, Ill. "We were really worried about what was going to happen and how we were going to come out of it."

Today's underlying optimism helps explain a central economic mystery of the last year: the continued willingness of consumers, despite uncertain times, the fall in the stock market and a sharp contraction in business investment, to take on more debt and buy new houses and other costly items. Their spending allowed last year's economic downturn to be among the shortest and perhaps the mildest on record, defying many post-Sept. 11 predictions that it would turn into the worst in decades.

Indeed, the recent recession is now almost certain to be the only one since 1949 in which consumer spending did not decline in any quarter. Last week, the government said that retail sales rose a solid 1.2 percent from March to April. But the recovery could be shaping up to be a meager one, according to leading economic indicators released yesterday by the Conference Board, a research firm in New York.

The confidence in America's economic future rests on two decades in which inflation and interest rates generally fell, one foreign economic rival after another faltered and long-term investments in stocks and homes were usually rewarded.

Even though the Dow Jones industrial average has dropped nearly 10 percent in the last year, it is twice as high as it was in late 1995. House prices are still rising in most cities. Unemployment has spiked since late 2000 but is significantly lower than it was at the end of past recessions.

"The image of America has been of a powerful, booming country without peer, an image that we haven't seen since the 1950's," said Alan Brinkley, a professor of American history at Columbia University. "We're seeing the cumulative impact of a social experience that extends back over a generation."

This rosy spirit may not necessarily last. The national mood tends to shift slowly, as it did when the problems of the 1970's chipped away relentlessly at the confidence of previous years. Many people are holding onto memories of the booming 90's, public opinion experts said; a stagnating stock market, a slump in earnings, or another terrorist attack could bring a new wave of doubt.

Already, people give a rosier appraisal of the country's condition than they do of their own, said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center.

Much of the new optimism probably stems from the higher pay that people in all income groups have been getting since 1996.

When joblessness fell in the late 1990's to the lowest level since the early 1970's, even the poorest fifth of American families received, on average, a 14 percent raise over the rate of inflation from 1996 to 2000, according to the Economic Policy Institute in Washington. From 1973 to 1996, real incomes for those in the same group fell 2 percent.

Middle-class families, who made only meager gains in the 1970's and 80's, also achieved solid progress in the late 90's. Affluent families continued to make the biggest strides.

The nation's families do not consider their own financial situation to be better than they did 20 years, according to polls, perhaps because many now work longer hours. But the recent income gains seem to have made them more sanguine about the years ahead.

"Maybe I'm overly optimistic," said Shirley Kagiwama-Manley, a 42-year-old computer programmer who lives in Littleton, Colo., with her husband and two children. "I just think everything is cyclical."

Over all, she was still confident enough to spend a recent afternoon on what she called a "girls' splurge," getting pedicures with friends at a Denver spa and then going to dinner.

"This isn't something I do all the time," she said, while waiting for her red toenail polish to dry.

The political implications of the new optimism are less clear than the economic effects, public opinion experts said. Incumbents have won a large share of their races over the last eight years, but many analysts think that reflects other factors as much as it does the improved sense of national well-being.

It is clear, however, that Americans have recently become more satisfied with and more optimistic about the economy.

In a monthly survey, the Conference Board asks people to evaluate the economy as positive, negative or neutral and to predict its condition in six months. In April, the index that the company calculates from the responses was at 109, up from a recent low of 85. In the 1990-91 recession, by contrast, it hit a low of 55, fell back to 47 in 1992, and did not recover to last month's level of 109 until 1996. The index fell to similar lows in the early 80's and mid-70's.

In the 60's, a decade of mostly good times, confidence measures behaved much as they have the last decade.

(Page 2 of 2)

Similarly, in early September — even before the terror attacks caused a surge of a patriotism and the answers to become more positive — 43 percent of people told the Gallup Poll that they were satisfied "with the way things were going in the United States."

In 1990, the number fell as low as 29 percent and then dipped further, in 1992, to 14 percent. In the late 70's and early 80's, it fluctuated from 12 percent to 35 percent.

To most Americans, the future seems brighter, too. In a New York Times/CBS News Poll late last year, more than 70 percent said that today's youth were likely to have a better life than their parents. In 1983, only 54 percent of respondents gave that answer, according to the Roper Organization, and the number remained near that in the mid-90's.

By now, however, almost everybody younger than 40 has experienced only one or two recessions as adults, and both were mild. During that span, layoffs have become common even in good times, but the economy has created enough new jobs to keep unemployment low.

"It feels like people I know who have been laid off have been able to find other jobs," said Ann Perry, a 38-year-old agent for artists and photographers in Pleasant Ridge, Mich., a suburb of Detroit. Ms. Perry said her business was "painfully slow" the last year but that the economy still seemed much healthier than it did a decade ago.

"I see people are still buying cars, still making home improvements," Ms. Perry said. "Things can't be that bad if so many people are driving these big, fancy S.U.V.'s."

Indeed, some of the best evidence of the confidence has been the powerful response to zero-interest financing offers major automakers began late last year. Almost six million people bought vehicles in the last four months of 2001, and most of them added thousands of dollars to their debt loads to do so.

"In a prior era, that promotion would have fallen flat," said Richard T. Curtin, director of the University of Michigan's monthly consumer surveys. "But if you view your long-term prospects as good, you say, `zero-interest loans? That's an opportunity I can't miss.' "

Many forecasters expected consumer spending to falter early this year, saying people would retrench after the buying binge. But spending grew, rising at a relatively fast annual rate of 3.5 percent in the first three months of the year, according to the Commerce Department.

The buying of homes, which is not included in the spending numbers, has remained strong, too. Ever-increasing home values — the most significant source of wealth for most families — have helped many people feel more secure.

"When we bought our house, it felt like a big risk," said Kathryn L. Evans, a map dealer in New Orleans.

In 1991, Ms. Evans and her husband, a firefighter, bought their century-old home in the city's Uptown section, when crime there was common and the economy was weak. The house is now worth three times what they have spent on it, she said.

Such increases in value have seared into people's minds the idea that investments will almost always pay off, as long as they wait a few years. Perhaps perversely, expectations for future returns have even increased.

About 90 percent of investors say the stock market will increase over the next 12 months, up from 64 percent in 1989, according to a survey by the Yale Schol of Management. The level has remained almost unchanged since early 2001 even as the market has dropped.

"People still remember the 90's," said Robert Shiller, an economist who oversees the survey.

James Wright is one of the optimists, despite having lost about 30 percent of the value of his 401(k) in recent years. "I'm still secure in investing in the stock market for the long run," said Mr. Wright, 57, of Deerfield, Ill. "For me, it's investing in the U.S., and so it's a good investment."

The dark lining to today's optimism may be the high expectations that many Americans now have for the future. If unemployment does not fall soon or the stock or housing market stagnates for years, the prosperity of the 90's will eventually start to feel far away.

"This has been a remarkable achievement," Mr. Curtin, the survey researcher, said about the shift from pessimism to optimism. "But let me caution you that it ain't over."

nytimes.com



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/21/2002 9:38:51 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Here are some interesting comments on the market...

Message 17494782

A Pullback, but Only a Slight One

5/21/02 08:07 AM ET

"There's a six-word formula for success: Think things through, then follow through."

-- Edward Rickenbacker

The market spent some time thinking things through yesterday. The Nasdaq had the second lightest volume day this year and the NYSE hasn't seen such a light-volume day since the week between Christmas and New Year's.

High-volume advances followed by low-volume pullbacks are textbook bullish action from a technical analysis standpoint. The key is that the pullback doesn't accelerate. There was no sign of that yesterday but the bulls need to follow through fairly soon. The market had great justification for weakness with the rising specter of terrorism and the Merrill Lynch suggestion to take technology profits. A market with a bearish bent would have acted much worse than what we saw yesterday.

Gold is hitting a two-year high at the $316 level. Gold stocks have been one of the best-performing groups lately and attracting increased attention as they continue to climb. Goldman feels the group is close to fully valued and has some cautious comments this morning. "These stocks are not supported by strong valuations. Rather, they are supported by a trading pattern that supports a history as a safe haven in times of uncertainty."

Salomon is cutting estimates on a number of software companies today, including Microsoft (MSFT:Nasdaq). They comment that the tough selling environment in March seems to have continued into April and May and feel that companies will cut guidance in the second half of the year in order to give themselves more "wiggle room."

Home Depot (HD:NYSE) beat estimates by 3 cents. Staples (SPLS:Nasdaq) posted strong earnings and guided estimates higher. Ford (F:NYSE) is getting a jump-start from Merrill Lynch this morning, which ups it to strong buy and names it a Focus One stock.

The tone is positive in the very early going. Futures are in the green and we aren't faced with any new developments that would justify some panic selling. We'll see if the bulls can get it together and try another charge to the upside.



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/21/2002 9:47:07 AM
From: Dalin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
Hi Volts,

Oh my gosh, welcome back!

Ok, I'm a little late, as usual, to the welcome home party, but I always show up.

I'm not late on rebuilding my portfolio.....way early as a matter of fact, but I got lots. Still holding cash too...just incase. If anyones ready for a decent bull run, it's me.

I tried trading a bit....with mixed results. I actually made a bit shorting, but that is WAY against the grain for me.

Let the bulls out of their pen....they need some exercise!

:o)

Ramblin



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/21/2002 10:38:06 AM
From: Jim Willie CB  Respond to of 65232
 
like you said, it is TIME CAPSULES and SENTIMENT

the time capsule began in March 2000, will end in 2004
the bear will last longer than you expect

the sentiment has turned negative on all things dollar-based
the frog's boiling pot is not visible to those whose visibility is unfortunately limited locally within the USA alone

the world is larger than the USA
the financial markets are bigger than the USA
when you say "nothing else matters", you need to be more honest and translate more humbly
"nothing else I understand"
this is my chief complaint about your writings
anything you dont understand is deemed irrelevant
that is where you have fallen in the past
I only hope you learn from past mistakes

I wish I could eradicate all my mistakes, but I cannot
I believe the essence of working through the current minefield is to bring to bear far more dimensions than what you deem relevant
and to especially bring to bear key indicators that offered loud warnings before serious declines in the past
you continue to ignore such indicators and their warnings
and you do so at your own peril

by the way, when you were supremely confident about investor sentiment in Aug-Sept 2000, Templeton shorted tech stocks and profited $92 million
his indicators were the inverted yield curve and reduced corporate capital expenditures
sentiment is but one of several key indicators
currency cash flow trumps mutual fund cash flow
every time

check it out on the dollar trading
quotes.ino.com
at risk of dropping below key support now

good luck to you
think vitamins: AU
/ jim



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/21/2002 11:36:41 AM
From: Jim Willie CB  Respond to of 65232
 
gold breaking out, over 316/oz (nothing huge yet)
still looking for the gold bear trap, none found
with all the backfilling and 10-20 supporting fundamentals,
this is building a firm rising base

it could be a figment of your imagination
or element of your wishful thinking
next rest stop: 322

kitco.com

silver also breaking out, over 482, a confirmation
next rest stop: 515

kitco.com

think vitamins: AU, AG
analysis beats out golf anyday
/ jim



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/21/2002 4:11:30 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Respond to of 65232
 
Jackass: "back2back tripledigit Dow downers next week"
said last Wednesday after back2back 100+ pt gainer days

we got it, yesterday and today
a repudiation of the empty Cisco rally two weeks ago
and the fool's rally last week
as the USdollar is slowly breaking down

the world is issuing a vote of "no confidence" in US economy
before your eyes, our financial markets are slowly crumbling
or should I say "deflating" ?

it is a shame you dont speak foreign languages
i.e. dollar, bonds, inflation, debts, commodities, interest rates, monetary expansion, fiat currency, trade debt, real rates, deflation, liquidation

and my favorite.....
bimetallism (which will return to a country south of you)

in the next few years we will likely see something never seen before
deflation in the debtor economy
inflation in the cash economy for essentials
a raging gold bull market
and a mild depression

some call it "The Coming Inflationary Depression"
see Ravi Batra
the liquidation of America's debts
its fury will be seen by how it CANNOT be stopped, once started
it has started, and the Check Writing Fed is helpless
/ jim



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/22/2002 4:59:22 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Fidelity Magellan Sells Some Tyco, Adds Some Tech

By Dan Culloton
Morningstar.com
Tuesday May 21, 5:05 pm Eastern Time

Fidelity Magellan (Nasdaq: FMAGX - News) manager Robert Stansky sold a significant number of his Tyco International (NYSE: TYC - News) shares earlier this year, according to the fund's annual report. Stansky also lightened his load of big pharmaceutical stocks and added to some bellwether technology names, according to the report that Fidelity released on Tuesday.

Tyco has inflicted the most pain on the world's second-largest mutual fund, which has lost 15.6% over the last 12 months and trails both the average large-cap blend fund and the S&P 500 over the trailing-12-month and year-to-date periods. The company "suffered greatly during the period from concerns about its accounting practices in the wake of the Enron collapse, its high debt load, and a restructuring plan to divide the company that took investors by surprise," Stansky said in the report.

At the end of last year Tyco was still one of Stansky's top five holdings. He has since cut back on that wager, though, selling about 6.5 million shares between the end of last September and March 31 of this year, according to the annual report. At the end of the first quarter, Tyco was still in the portfolio but no longer among Magellan's top 10 holdings.

Stansky also trimmed his positions in big drugmakers since his fund's semiannual report. He shed big slugs of Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY - News), Merck (NYSE: MRK - News), and Schering-Plough (NYSE: SGP - News). He also sold some Pfizer (NYSE: PFE - News) shares, but the stock remains one of Stansky's top holdings. Overall, Stansky reduced the fund's health-care weighting by about three percentage points in the six months covered by the report. "But the benefits of being underweighted in health care were outweighed by the weak performance of some of the fund's investments in pharmaceutical stocks," Stansky said. "While some of the fund's health-care services stocks such as United Health Group (NYSE: UNH - News) were strong performers, several of the big drug companies such as Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY - News), Merck, and Schering-Plough suffered from disappointing earnings."

Magellan still contained less technology than the S&P 500 at the end of the first quarter, and although he has made some recent tech purchases, Stansky remains cautious about the sector. Stansky said companies wouldn't have a good idea of what they plan to spend on technology for the rest of this year and next year until the end of June. "At that time, I should have a better idea of when a recovery in business prospects might occur and how to position the fund accordingly," Stansky said. Despite his uncertainty about tech's near-term prospects, he bought about 6.5 million shares of networking giant Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO - News) between September 30, 2001, and March 31, 2002, and added more than 1 million and 2 million shares, respectively, to his Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT - News) and Intel (Nasdaq: INTC - News) holdings during the period.

Overall, Stansky has sober expectations for the stock market. "It's difficult to get too excited about the market in the near term," he said. "I'm looking for modest returns from stocks for a couple of reasons. First, valuations are still historically high. Second, it continues to appear to me as if earnings growth will be somewhat subdued as we continue the economic recovery."



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/22/2002 4:35:10 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
By Yearend, "Investing Long Will Pay Off"

BusinessWeek Online
Personal Investing: INVESTING Q&A
Wednesday May 22, 2002

The stock market is on the upswing -- the best evidence of which is that mutual funds are buying again. And it's time to go back to an aggressive growth strategy. Those are among the observations of Pat O'Neil, president of Loring Investment and manager of the Loring Hedge Fund.

O'Neil expects a 33% increase in profits for the technology sector in this quarter, vs. a 30% decrease in the last quarter. And profitability is what he looks for in selecting stocks. The names that have done best for his fund in the downturn include auction Web site eBay and discount retailer Dollar Tree Stores. But he also likes Southwest Airlines, pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson, and a Los Angeles bank, UCBH, that caters largely to immigrants from China -- who have a very low loan default rate.

These were some of the points O'Neil made in a chat presented May 16 by BusinessWeek Online on America Online, in response to questions from the audience and from BW Online's Jack Dierdorff and Karyn McCormack. Edited excerpts from this chat follow. A full transcript is available from BusinessWeek Online on AOL at keyword: BW Talk.

Q: Pat, dare we hope that the up days of the market are a harbinger of a better tone?

A: I do think so. It took eight months for the market to recover from 9/11, and the volume we see this week indicates mutual-fund buying.

I expect the next 6 to 10 weeks to continue this upward trend -- three of five days up every week.

Q: Can you give us your definition of a hedge fund, Pat?

A: Typical hedge funds are "shoot 'em up," Wild West-style investing. Being a grandfather, I'm more on the side of "find a good stock, buy it, and if I have to hedge, I will sell part of the position and go to cash." Hedge funds might typically do things like trade currencies, futures, commodities, and options with the idea of making a lot of money in a hurry. That's probably a better example of a typical hedge fund.

Q: What lessons can the average investor take from the strategies you use in managing a hedge fund?

A: My No. 1 qualifier is profitability. Unless the company is making money for the last year, it doesn't get on the desk to be researched. We look at groups of stocks that are showing the most profit growth, and the highest profit growth is in technology. Despite this last year of trouble, technology profits are going to make a 33% gain this quarter. That's above a 30% loss last quarter. And stock prices always follow earnings.

Q: Which groups in tech interest you the most?

A: I like e-commerce, such as eBay (NasdaqNM:EBAY - News). The other group that's strong coming out of a bear market is financial stocks. Bear Stearns (NYSE:BSC - News) and Citigroup (NYSE:C - News) are two of the best in that area.

Q: What stocks have done the best for your fund through the downturn?

A: eBay and Dollar Tree Stores (NasdaqNM:DLTR - News), a discounter, have held up the best in the last six months. I like Southwest Airlines (NYSE:LUV - News) -- it's the only air carrier to make money for the last 30 years, and so many airline stocks are down that I think this is a good buy.

Q: What are the criteria for investing in a hedge fund? It's beyond the reach of the small investor, isn't it?

A: Yes. Hedge funds are closed to the general public. They're kind of like a private golf club, where rich people throw their money in the pot, and somebody -- in this case, me -- tries to invest it and share in the profits. People can do their own hedge-fund-type investing -- that is, investing for six months or so -- if they just do some homework and look for profitable companies.

Q: You started a new service in January called StockList. Can you tell us about it?

A: StockList is a three-stock real-money portfolio that I opened in my own name. It's actually what I plan to do once I retire -- manage a small three-stock portfolio. My StockList service at my Web site [stockbook.com] lets people look over my shoulder as I manage three stocks at a time. They, of course, can do the same in their own account. I demonstrate for people why I'm buying a stock and why I'm selling it, and then I follow the rules week to week. It has been very successful. In the last four months, we have closed nine trades, winning seven and losing two. We are up 18% or so this year.

Q: What three stocks are you managing now in this fund?

A: The three stocks are open only to the subscribers. But I will tell you three of the trades that we just closed. One was Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE:ANF - News), which we paid $22 for and closed at $29. We also bought Hotel Reservation Network (NasdaqNM:ROOM - News), in at $42, out at $51. On the downside, I bought a stock called CGI Group (NYSE:GIB - News), which was profitable and everything looked great, but we got in at $7.50, out at $6.50, and it's lower now. So you never know!

Q: Have you had any other big losers recently? In the hedge fund?

A : I've not had any big losers, because we establish the selling rule when we buy the stock -- and stick to it. There was a stock called Craftmade (NasdaqNM:CRFT - News) that we bought at $18.10, and at the time of purchase I raised my right hand and said, "If the stock ever hits $15.50, we're out." And sure enough, it went to $15.50, and we took the loss. The key to successful short-term trading is deciding when you're going to sell at the time of the purchase. Then there's no wondering what to do later on. You just have to sell when the stop line is hit.

Q: Does the quality of earnings -- and of the accounting that produces the numbers -- concern you? Didn't Enron scare a lot of companies to stop creative accounting and depress earnings this year?

A: First of all, fake numbers are a grave concern to those of us who invest professionally and to everyone's 401[k]. There's no way to assure that the company numbers are right. This is when I go back to investing in the management and not betting on the company. I like Cisco's (NasdaqNM:CSCO - News) boss, John Chambers, as a person. And if you read or listen to his reports to shareholders online, I think you'll agree that he makes sense and sounds legitimate.

This doesn't guarantee anything, but it makes me more confident if I believe in the person running the company. I feel the same way about the eBay president, Meg Whitman. I don't think it's the case that creative accounting has hurt the latest earnings reports up and down the line. It was a hangover from the bear market triggered by 9/11 that stopped our economy cold.

Q: With WorldCom (NasdaqNM:WCOM - News) being one of the leaders in telecom and having cash to weather the sector's drought, do you see it as a good long-term investment?

A: Yes, I do. If you consider buying WorldCom today for $1.30 a share, this stock only has to go to $2.60 for a 100% return. I don't think it's unreasonable that WorldCom and the telecom group will begin to move in the next six months.

Q: My hedge fund isn't doing too well this year. Is reduced performance widespread this year? What about your fund?

A: Yes, it's widespread -- including mine! Depending on the hedge fund's strategy, I would say, "Was this an environment that my manager should have been successful in?" For instance, if he were selling stocks short, he or she should have had a good year. In my case, we only go long, so I'm not surprised that we have not made any money. I do expect that by the end of the year, investing long will pay off.

Q: What's a fair hedge-fund management fee?

A: They vary, depending on the success record of the fund. But an average fee would be 3% per year, plus 15% of the yearend net profits.

Q: What do you think about using an aggressive growth strategy in this market?

A: I think that right now is the time to turn up the dial on mutual-fund allocation to growth and aggressive growth. These stocks are now getting earnings that exceed expectations, and the number I mentioned before in technology [going from -30% profits last quarter to +33% this quarter] is typical of how quickly the market can change.

Ninety-nine of 100 people are so sick of losing money that they are reluctant to put money in aggressive investments now. However, I think now is the time. I think we've run out of sellers in the market, and we've seen the worst on the Nasdaq index, where the aggressive stocks are located.

Q: You've told us you like the tech and financial groups -- and at least one discount retailer. Any others -- health care and pharmas, for example?

A: Well, I like Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ - News), as they continue to grow their business 15% per year and have made money for the last 17 quarters, right through the bear market and 9/11. There's a small bank in California that I like called UCBH Holdings (NasdaqNM:UCBH - News) that specializes in serving the Chinese immigrant market. The people entering the U.S. from China settle and mostly stay in Los Angeles. This bank is Chinese-owned and has a steady stream of new customers. This may be cultural, but they have the smallest loan-default rate in the U.S. I like the stock for about a 25% move in the next year, from $40 to $50.

Another medical company is Quest Diagnostics (NYSE:DGX - News). Quest is in a very boring business -- they make and execute medical and lab tests. However, it's very steady, and their profits are growing at 40% per year, and sales are growing at 13% per year. I try to follow the stocks that are attracting mutual-fund money. Most funds will buy profitable, growing companies and hold on as long as the quarterly reports continue to show growth.

Consumer stocks such as Best Buy (NYSE:BBY - News) will continue to do well as we come out of the recession and begin a new bull market. If you noticed last week after Sears (NYSE:S - News) offered to buy Lands' End (NYSE:LE - News), the mutual-fund money rushed into Sears stock, and it's up $5 in the last few days. I think retail stocks will continue to do well.

Q: With corporate spending still not picking up, will the market soon start a downward slide? Do you see revived earnings reviving capital spending, which is something tech really needs?

A: I agree -- tech needs the spending. And instead of my opinion, we're looking at the actual earnings reports, and they are, as a group, exceeding expectations. Cisco exceeded last week, which was the catalyst for this spark in the market. I think if you watch technology earnings reports for the next three months, you will see more upside surprises than we have had in the last year. Again, it boils down to what the real numbers are saying.

biz.yahoo.com



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/24/2002 12:08:39 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 65232
 
12:06 ET Tyco CIT unit gets $5 bln bid from Lehman-- CNBC (TYC) 25.00 +0.63:



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/24/2002 2:07:16 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
14:04 ET Tyco: Lehman withdraws $5 bln offer for CIT-- Wall St Journal (TYC) 24.35 -0.02: -- Update --



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/29/2002 12:58:25 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Volt, you'd be right if runofmill recession (NOT) /jw



To: Voltaire who wrote (51827)5/31/2002 11:33:11 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
SEC pursuing 10 analyst conflict probes-lawmaker

WASHINGTON, May 31 (Reuters) - The top U.S. financial
regulator is pursuing 10 investigations of possible conflicts
of interest by securities analysts, a lawmaker said on Friday,
amid a growing credibility crisis for Wall Street analysts.
Rep. Edward Markey said the Securities and Exchange
Commission told him about the 10 probes, as well as 37 other
pending enforcement inquiries under way at the self-regulatory
organizations (SROs) that supervise the major stock exchanges.
"The commission and the SROs are currently pursuing a
significant number of cases involving potential securities laws
violations by Wall Street research analysts," Markey said.
In a statement, the Massachusetts Democrat said some of the
SEC inquiries relate to "potential conflicts with investment
banking services, and some are multi-faceted inquiries that may
include other violations of the securities laws."
Markey said the SEC informed him that four of the probes
relate to personal trading by analysts in the securities they
cover. Another relates to receipt by an analyst of undisclosed
compensation from a company, he said.
Merrill Lynch <MER.N>, top U.S. investment bank, last week
agreed to pay $100 million to settle charges, levelled by New
York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, that its analysts --
aiming to boost its investment banking business -- publicly
touted Internet stocks they slammed as "junk" in private.
The SEC, Spitzer and state officials are investigating.
The SEC said it had no immediate comment on Markey's
statement.
((Kevin Drawbaugh, Washington newsroom, 202-898-8313, 202
898 8401 (fax), kevin.drawbaugh@reuters.com))
REUTERS
*** end of story ***