SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (30668)5/24/2002 8:42:07 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I like the idea that negotiable instruments were an important source of price inflation.


As you know, I use a narrow definition of Inflation. I believe that inflation is a general price increase that happens when the money supply increases faster than productivity. It can be caused by metal or paper. I don't see negotiable bills of exchange causing inflation because they would tend to rise in use as trade rises, causing stability, not inflation. Without them, an increase in production caused by an increase in trade, or visa versa, would tend to be deflationary.

A huge increase in Gold and silver, as happened in Spain, at a time when productivity in Spain was not increasing, caused their inflation, IMO.



To: Ilaine who wrote (30668)5/24/2002 11:20:24 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Maybe the reason Catholic countries developed later was stricter enforcement of laws against paying interest.

It certainly had an influence. One reason that the Lombards developed into the major bankers of medieval Italy is that they were originally Arrians.

And the Jews never had strict usury laws, and developed their own hawala system.