SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric L who wrote (119315)5/25/2002 11:59:44 AM
From: limtex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
EL - On Dec 6th Q was around $55 - $63 range. Even marginmike thought that $55 was a buy and $60 something was a sell.

As the market collapsed due originally to the Radio Shack slowing handset report Q collapsed from the above level to a low of $25. And then come all the price targets at $48 or $40 or $35 etc.

Seems to me that since Q4 01 Q's propsects have only improved. W-CDMA is going to be opened in parts of Europe in the fall and the royalties and maybe even the chip sales are on their way.

What a difference from Decmber.

Best,

L



To: Eric L who wrote (119315)5/25/2002 1:48:06 PM
From: kech  Respond to of 152472
 
Hoffman on Inventory - "Extended comments on channel inventories". The question to me is whether this supposed caution on inventories is providing an appearance of due diligence when the negative outcome is already determined.

It is amazing to me that when Sprint talks about 12-15 new 1x phone models that is is going to push with its 1X launch and Verizon as well, that Hoffman can get upset about an extra four weeks of inventory in the channel. He even acknowledges that all these phones are coming on line, but then says he doesn't think there will be much take up of 1X. That is his opinion, he is entitled to it, but to couch it as an "inventory problem", when each new model has to get stockpiled, dispersed around to all the Radio Shacks in the country, seems like a short masquerading caution to me. I would be much more upset if there was not all these chipsets out there ready to support a powerful launch to end users. And by the way, the "inventory" includes chips at OEMS and on service provider shelves installed in unsold phones. This is a bit different than even the "channel inventory" problem people usually talk about as an inventory problem. The service provider and the OEM may even have paid for the chips and they are still considered as inventory in this analysis. And if Verizon and Sprint are bullish enough to put in orders for all these phones, I don't see why one would want to second guess them. Of course the rollout has to be successful before they order more, but then put the uncertainty on the success of the roll-out, which Q has done, not on the inventory problem.

By the way, I assure you that Sprint at least is ecstatic about all the new phone models they will be rolling out soon.



To: Eric L who wrote (119315)5/26/2002 10:26:25 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
SoundView assumes that inventory levels are higher than QUALCOMM has stated. There is no basis that I can find for such an assumption. Also the new features available in high end chips raise revenue per chip and/or royalties per unit. This is what makes QUALCOMM's views conservative and SoundView's unfounded.

Art