Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eclectus who wrote (85870)	5/26/2002 4:17:34 PM
From: marek_wojna	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116818

<<One can argue the rights and wrongs of Israel all day but in the end one must choose a side. I choose Israel!>> Wrong again. Bush cannot find any allies in Europe just because he used very similar phrase - "Who is not with us is against us". Become an anarchist, friend of the humans, not the nation or the country. People are good, is just greed, political or religious ambitions of not so many individuals who cannot overcome their fear of not being noticed during their short time on this planet.

To: Eclectus who wrote (85870)	5/27/2002 1:21:25 AM
From: Richnorth	Respond to of 116818

While accusing me of being emotional, you are certainly being emotional, too. Enough said! I do not disagree that Israel is a friend of the U.S. But what I do not accept is that some paranoid Jewish elements presume it is their birthright to insult, ridicule, threaten and intimidate people who voice any criticisms against Israel's behaviour towards the Palestinians and they expect the critics to be cowed into silence and/or toe the Israeli line. My! The height of arrogance! In their attempt to gain support and curry sympathy they try make their intended victims look bad and guilty by ridiculing and insulting them as well as insinuating/attributing outrageous remarks/opinions to them in the hope their "victims" will somehow be goaded into doing something foolish and thereby putting themselves in bad light. I did not start the exchange. DSM did. So far I have been responding to derisive language with an admixture of barbed language, sarcasm and irony to put that pretentious and obnoxious and pompous DSM in his place. And this is certainly justified as it is now clear beyond a shadow of doubt that DSM has a sinister agenda.