SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (259119)5/28/2002 1:05:42 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
He's a petty, partisan, whining demolib pinhead. You are wasting your keystrokes.....

JLA



To: Neocon who wrote (259119)5/28/2002 2:58:56 PM
From: MSI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
"scur·ri·lous"
Pronunciation: 'sk&r-&-l&s, 'sk&-r&-
Function: adjective
Date: 1576
1 a : using or given to coarse language b : being vulgar and evil <scurrilous imposters who used a religious exterior to rob poor people -- Edwin Benson>
2 : containing obscenities, abuse, or slander <a...campaign filled with scurrilous charges and countercharges -- A. D. Graeff>

The non-scurrilous questions are raised by their own actions and lack of action. My interests are self-defense, since state their they wish to accept a dangerous structure on purely military terms, without debate. The only political analysis seems to be how much can they get away with.

That is not disingenuous, I am very sincere.

If this administration succeeded in stopping terrorism, explaining their secrecy and apparent deception, and righted the economy, I'd happily to on to other matters in life, rather than being in stunned disbelief at the acceptance of their actions.

I think the national government, if properly run, doesn't much matter in the course of our lives, nor should it. Instead we have intrusion, secrecy and deception, by all evidence, in magnitude not seen before, by an administration whose priority is to use all of this for political and personal gain.



To: Neocon who wrote (259119)5/28/2002 3:00:48 PM
From: MSI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
No, once again you misread either purposely or accidentally.

You claimed I was an enemy of this Administration.

That is very interesting language.

I'll have more to say on that subject in another post