Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dacoola who wrote (77317)	6/2/2002 2:49:46 AM
From: Edscharp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

dacoola, as I recall Ed blundered and announced that the company had halted trading of it's own stock pending some stupendous announcement Sorry, but you recall wrong and I'm not going to let you get away with re-writing history. EGBT did request their trading to be halted, but I will for the purpose of this post concede the possibility that the SEC halted trading for reasons of their own. Either way it went, this would've been irrelevant to my original thesis that many short-traders could've been caught in the stock with significant short positions, regardless of the reason for a trading stop. I believed then (and even now) that the EGBT bashers performed extreme overkill on this company . Indeed, I had expounded on this very same theory on the RB board on February 15, well before my deleted post was made on Silicon Investor. The post I made on SI was 'toned down' and re-worded from the below posts, but the gist was the same. ragingbull.lycos.com ragingbull.lycos.com