Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: charred who wrote (4387)	6/3/2002 6:03:55 PM
From: russwinter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4504

<those conclusions> I'm sorry, I thought we were discussing this "election" and legitimate rule of law? MAN hasn't told me a thing, I can observe and think about these events myself. You asked me if I knew anything about Peru, and I answered yes based on a month there. That's a straight up answer to your question isn't it? I'm not going to be PC with you about this, as I strongly feel as a result of that experience that this "election" may very well be a sham. And the reason for my sentiment: I regularly observed pathological cheating, scams and poor business practices in that country.

To: charred who wrote (4387)	6/3/2002 8:40:16 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4504

<Everyhting MAN told you was a load of crap.> Charred, This vote says that you and Elisabeth have been right all along. Unless Russ is right when he suggest possible corruption, it seems that the company has not been telling everything over those years. For sure, this vote doesn't match what the company has been saying. I am surprised. And I certainly agree with you that we should not go against the will of the people. It is their life after all.

To: charred who wrote (4387)	6/3/2002 11:25:55 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4504

A little rough on russ personally there, quemadura .... i thought the same, believed stuff that was presented to me as out of the company [and was imho, i've got probing questions on that], that they'd done a better job of convincing tambograndinos, that they'd get a significant minority of yes vote .... and no i didn't hear any of that from SIers .... the chart actually was what convinced me to start in on man last month, it was doing retraces but finding support, there were signs of accumulation ... and it did have a nice tradeable pop .... this is not the end of the Manhattan story by any means, but at this point it is clear you were right on local sentiment