SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (75123)6/5/2002 10:23:11 PM
From: augieboo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Anybody notice the the US talking about attacking Iraq while urging restraint on India and Pakistan. Funny if it wasn't so tragic. .

George, I have to disagree with you on that one.

Mushariff is trying to reign in the radical Islamists who are carrying out terror attacks against India -- acts of responsibility and reason for which I predict he will eventually be assassinated. I think, therefore, that he deserves a great deal of slack from India, but the Indian government can't give it because they are on the verge of collapse.

Saddam, on the other hand, starves and gasses his own people, while funding terrorists whose greatest dream is to slaughter your grandchildren.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (75123)6/5/2002 10:26:50 PM
From: ajtj99  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Carl Rove and the Pentagon Hawks in action, George. Also, Bush's seem to do better in the polls when they can foster some fear. GB 41 tried to even make us fear Broccoli.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (75123)6/5/2002 10:39:38 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
It's easier to talk about a first strike when the opponent is still in the process of developing a WMD delivery capability, not afterwards. They fear Iraq is within two years of that ability. How much support will you have over here once they are WMD-capable.