Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (261611)	6/6/2002 12:49:34 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769668

This is the relevant section: willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true It appears to me from the supposed contradictions adduced in the article that one could not make the case. Thus, I do not believe that he committed perjury. And although there is a difference between saying that someone had committed perjury and that he had been convicted, perjury is a term of art, and claiming that someone committed perjury means that one has confidence that a fair trial would produce conviction. Thus, it seems to me that you have exceeded the evidence in your claim. Finally, I have no idea of what was behind the settlement, and would draw no conclusions damaging to Bush from it........