SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (14387)6/7/2002 7:24:21 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
I believe him.

Message 17574926

You can refuse to face the obvious, but it doesn't become less obvious because you've done that.

What do you believe, anyway? This?

...Last August he claimed to have promised not to dip into the Social Security surplus except in case of war or recession. Subsequently, he claimed only to have promised not to run a deficit (even with the help of Social Security surpluses), and he added a third exception: "national emergency." In the last couple of months he's added more detail to this account. Now, as Bush tells it in his speeches, he made the promise "in Chicago." He says he was asked if he would ever run a deficit by "a reporter," although at various points he has identified the questioner as "a fellow," "some guy," "they," "somebody," and "the guy." (As in, "I remember campaigning in Chicago one time, and the guy said, `Would you ever deficit spend?'") When did this Chicago promise occur? Time after time, Bush says only that it happened "during the campaign" or "when I was running for president." Last week, though, he rendered the story thusly: "When I was campaigning here [in Chicago], they said, `Hey, Mr. President, would you ever have a deficit?'" It would, of course, be odd for anybody--let alone a reporter--to have addressed Bush as "Mr. President" during the campaign. The next day Bush recounted the episode as having taken place "in 2002."

So what you are saying you believe is what exactly? that he said to "a reporter," "in Chicago" "during the campaign" that he would "deficit spend" and raid the lockbox of SS? Or was it just "to a guy"? And was it not "during the campaign" at all, but "in 2002," as he said the day after he had quoted "the guy" as calling him "Mr. President"? Which is it that you believe?

I think it's best just to admit he lied because he didn't want the voters to know something, just like Clinton when Clinton said "I didn't have sex with that woman." Politicians who have weak characters tend to lie a lot to cover their asses.

Of course Bush wasn't under oath, and was only trying to fool the voters about what he'd promised them before the election on their Social Security issue, not about a blow job, so you don't have to remind me that the two situations aren't the same!