Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (249)	6/7/2002 2:50:04 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

Jim, what you "assume" and what I "admit", are certainly different from each other. I used to teach quite a lot, and anyone that would give me a five page argument would fail. The case for and the case against gold can be made each with half a page, even that might be too much. I have been talking about the link of gold and dollar for about five years here, and since my current scenario has an explosion of the trade deficit and a resulting decline in the dollar, I had a bull move for Gold for already six months or so. I also suggested that after $300 is taken, $330/40 will serve as a barrier and later this year or early next year, a possibility of a spike to $400. As for the various conspiracies, maybe the exist maybe they don't, but gold is not a metal which is in short supply once the price is above $300/ounce. I am already going beyond the half page, so, I'll stop here. (g). Zeev