Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (49877)	6/10/2002 11:44:47 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"I think it matters how the criticism is framed and that slinging names at someone is an escalation." The terms I used do not qualify as name calling Karen. They were all terms that appropriately describe the specific behavior. Except for the term "illogical" they are even terms that X uses to describe her own behavior. They are not profanities or vulgar body function words used to label anyone's persona. I qualified each term for you in the last post. If you can show how anyone of those terms, as I have qualified it, does not describe the behavior then I would like to know how. "Some have a problem with any kind of criticism or disagreement. If you want to label those terms on the side of criticism that was so strong as to provoke "a problem" with X, you may have a point. But in my view "a problem" already existed.