Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jcky who wrote (32062)	6/10/2002 12:28:20 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 281500

You don't punish the entire Palestinian civilian population for the despicable action of some militant Arabs unless you are implying all Palestinians are hidden militants and deserving of their fate. Civilians suffer for the bad choices of their rulers. In this case, Arafat made the brilliant decision to leave the best offer he's ever going to see on the table and start a terrorist campaign. The PA is openly militant (discounting ritual lies to the Western Press) and the Palestinians still support it, the incorrigible idiots. Simply put, the Palestinians do not have the right to blow up Israeli ice cream parlors and the Israelis do have the right to try to stop them.

To: jcky who wrote (32062)	6/11/2002 1:56:15 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Anybody Hungry? From "Reason" Subsidizing Hunger By Ronald Bailey How to feed the world's 815 million hungry people is the topic of the under-attended World Food Summit beginning today in Rome. The New York Times reports that only two leaders from rich nations are attending the summit. In 1996, U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization set the goal of cutting the number of hungry from 840 million to 400 million by 2015. Progress toward this goal is being stymied by two activities: corrupt governments in poor countries and vast subsidies in rich countries. One of the worst cases of corruption leading to famine is occurring in Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe devastated farming by seizing white-owned farms and giving them to political cronies. Mugabe made the situation even worse when he turned back a food aid shipment from the United States because it might have contained genetically modified corn. Of course, Americans have been eating such perfectly safe corn for 6 years. How do subsidies affect famine? The United States and Europe are subsidizing their farmers to the tune of about $300 billion a year. In 1999, European farmers got 49 percent of their income as government handouts while American farmers received 24 percent of theirs as federal giveaways. This means that developed country food markets are effectively closed to exports from farmers in poor countries. The result is that poor farmers who could produce food more cheaply have no chance to improve their lot and consumers in rich countries pay more for food in the form of taxes and higher prices. Out-competed by rich subsidized farmers, farmers in poor countries (who often make up more than half the population) are stuck on a subsistence-farming treadmill--never able to afford better seeds, equipment, or fertilizer that would help them compete and improve their families' lives. Sadly, while truly free trade is a key to reducing hunger in the world, it will likely go relatively undiscussed at the World Food Summit.