SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kapkan4u who wrote (166203)6/11/2002 5:13:09 PM
From: fingolfen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
I bought my first AMD while still at Intel in November 1998, after learning the first details about K7. Few months later I was completely out of INTC. There was a remote chance of credible competition to the monopoly -- the risk I was not willing to take.

I've heard the "monopoly argument" a lot of times... I'm not convinced it holds water. By getting out of Intel in 1998, you missed a lot of profit in holding Intel. I bought and sold several times from 1998-2000 and made a fair amount of money each time. Holding AMD long through that same time period would have netted nothing (unless you played the couple of peaks on AMD).



To: kapkan4u who wrote (166203)6/11/2002 5:20:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Kap, <Intel's business model doesn't work when stripped of the monopoly powers.>

What a crock. If anything, the so-called "monopoly powers" is what led Intel to become complacent. Competition helped drive Intel's real innovation, and you see the results today: Northwood is far outpacing Athlon.

Watch as Hammer repeats the cycle, this time in servers.

Tenchusatsu