Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WCOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (10653)	6/16/2002 8:42:27 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11568

chinton, yes, I see, you must be more objective than me. <LOL> I didn't buy this guy at $60, or, $40, or $20, or $10, but I'm buying it at ~$1.50. Don't underestimate my understanding and objectivity just because of posting arguments. IMO the perceived WCOM risk is in the price, the perception is wrong. But then again, you do know better than I do. <LOL>

To: c.hinton who wrote (10653)	6/16/2002 12:28:41 PM
From: John Curtis	Respond to of 11568

Chinton: The problems originate at wcom... Oh, boy, is that ever the truth! But they're not alone. You can look all across the telecom landscape and find it somewhat puzzling and tragic that a fair number of fairly bright people ended up getting their corporations fiscal cajones (ahem) in such a massive vice. From the speculative start-up to the tried and true ILEC community everybody more or less took leave of their fiscal senses by believing their own, or industrial, press (as it were). It'd be comical if so many people hadn't gotten so badly hurt along the way....people that may not find jobs in telecom ever again. John~