SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John F. Dowd who wrote (166440)6/16/2002 1:51:04 PM
From: bacchus_ii  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"Maybe we should go after every company that cost investors big time $. I mean we need to build trust here. What crap!"

Really? In the pass 2 years Intel's shareholders have lost over 350B, are you on the go after Intel?

Gottfried



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (166440)6/16/2002 5:58:56 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: Enron was an aberration

Oh really?

Arthur Anderson....

Global Crossing....

Adelphia....

Tyco....

ImClone....

One incident could be an aberattion. However, when there is a list of violators, it can no longer be termed an aberration by definition.

The list above goes on and on......what you fail to realize is that transparent business practices are what has separated the American Equity markets from that of much of the world. Failing to provide for transparency that can be trusted by the general public, we will be no better than any other equity market.

What crap!

Your short-sightedness is surpassed only by your lack of eloquence:-)



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (166440)6/17/2002 1:16:36 AM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
OT2

"People lost more $ in LU and NT then in Enron "

The difference is that in Enron, the non-disclosure rose to the level of fraud, not just bad investments.

This makes a big difference when the allocation of capital is the object.