Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1271)	6/19/2002 7:34:58 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1715

My background is irrelevant to my sincere request for evidence... >>as evidence of Cheney's malfeasance is brought out into the light.<< These are only allegations at this time, I would be cautious about making libelous and/or slanderous public statements about anyone without evidence to document and support those statements... I realize this is "only" a post on SI, but let's remain intellectually honest, maintain some investigative discipline, and keep this clean..... >>The revelations about "Death Star", "Ricochet" and "Fat Boy" came from his office.<< Very good, now we have something to examine... If these projects exist, then these projects can be investigated without the paper(s) you say Cheney is withholding... one's "fingerprints," so to speak, can be found everywhere if they're actively involved in something as large as you say... >>Dunn is threatening a subpeona (sic) to get Perot on the stand.<< There is no reason to threaten a subpoena, anytime an official statement or deposition is taken, a subpoena should be routinely issued, it's just a matter of good business and it helps to document the investigative steps... Let's see what Perot's statements will reveal, if anything..... Welcome back to this investigation, I think..... GZ