SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : MANIPULATION IS RAMPANT --- Can We Stop It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave Gore who wrote (396)6/19/2002 9:09:02 AM
From: Dave Gore  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 589
 
Congress probes Merrill alert on FDA's ImClone ruling By Allen Wan

My comments ----- analysts really being watched now. This will send a message. The analyst said there was "speculation" and then later admitted, it was based on an "analystical question". In other words, his own speculation and assumption.

****

Congressional investigators are examining how a Merrill Lynch (MER: news, chart, profile) biotech analyst speculated that federal regulators might deal a major setback to ImClone (IMCL: news, chart, profile) before there was any public disclosure, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the probe. Merrill analyst Eric Hecht on Dec. 27 alerted his firm's brokers -- and therefore its clients -- that there was "speculation" that the FDA might refuse to accept ImClone's application for the drug Erbitux. On Dec. 28, the FDA formally rejected ImClone's application to market the drug, sending Imclone stock into a tailspin. Hecht said in an interview with the Journal that he "didn't know they (ImClone) were going to receive" a refusal to file letter and his decision was based on a "reasonable analytical question, since the 60-day notice was approaching." Martha Stewart, head of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO: news, chart, profile), is also being investigated for possible insider trading as a result of shares of ImClone she sold just prior to the FDA ruling. She has denied the allegations.



To: Dave Gore who wrote (396)6/19/2002 9:27:26 AM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 589
 
What's the big secret, Dave?

I've responded to the post containing the subject of my question twice now. Do you really not know about the origin/usage of the "who wrote" number in the heading of posts?

Here's a link to the post I'm asking about. For the third time, what's the source of this information - a link, site name, something to that effect?

Message 17609446