Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : MANIPULATION IS RAMPANT --- Can We Stop It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (442)	6/22/2002 8:39:48 PM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 589

You've repeated this slander against me on several threads for several months. "Slander"? ROFL - they're your words, I'm just repeating them. I will continue to post them as I see fit. [W]hat was meant as a small bit of levity[.] It's predictable, disingenuous, and laughable to suggest, months later, that they were some form of satire or gallows humor when they're perfectly consistent with the content all your other posts, the one to which I'm responding included. In particular, this remark - made more recently about the World Trade Center - carries the exact same callousness: Message 17532440 I was there. I knew one of the victims well, a few distantly, and saw the effect on the city, the families, and the communities in the days, weeks, and now months afterward. It's one thing to say those things, yet another to in so cowardly a manner try to weasel away from them. To that point - not to mention the different content of the objectionable message(s) in question - your attempts to describe yourself in the same light as Bill Maher is also preposterous. [Y]our ad hominem attack...shows you for what you are. An unethical and dishonest scammer. That's libelous talk, Duray. I suppose your next move is to claim that the following are "innocents"[.] Nope. See, pal, I wait until the legal trial or finding is/are complete before I start heaving judgment. I certainly don't believe people are "innocent until being proven guilty," but that they're "not guilty until proven guilty." If you don't understand that, I'm not surprised. Some of the people/firms you listed in that list are certainly, within the scope of the modern legal and regulatory system, "guilty." Some are not. Some will settle whether they are in fact guilty or not guilty, thereby - at least to the extent the public record is concerned - making the issue moot. But in virtually all cases, you and the rest of your band of morons completely glaze over the focus and content of most of my posts - if you don't believe it, I can point out numerous examples. I'm focused more on the implications to Constitutionality and freedom that these issues represent, not on retribution, remuneration, or some fantasy of an egalitarian utopia. Your present course indicates the completely craven and amoral nature of your soulless existence. LOL. You are precisely the sort of scoundrel I warned Dave Gore about when I said: Illegitimus non Carborundum LOL. That was a "warning"? It's yet another staccato, specious attempt to appear intellectual and thereby buttress your rhetoric-long, knowledge-short posts. Just a hint, guy - you can't impress anyone with slogans that appear on tens of thousands of college sweatshirts or on folksy, middle America websites. Here's one off the top of my head for you: Ignotium por ignotius; et obscurum per obscurious; damnant quod...non intelligunt. Figure it out. I'm not sure that all the conjugations are exactly right (I always had problem with those damned gerunds), but I remember enough to consider myself conversant. I see your obsessive nastiness remains unabated by time or reality. As for obsessive, you're the one who posts for what often seems ten or twelve hours per day, often up to thirty or forty messages each day. With regard to nastiness, they're your words - choke on 'em. But what "reality" has changed? LOL!!! You should be ashamed of yourself for being engaged in such small-minded personal attacks. ROFL. For an example of personal attacks of a particularly small-minded nature, your last post to me can only be seen, in part, by doing a full-text search including the words "LP" and "Antilles." It was so obscenity ridden and offensive that SI deleted it. siliconinvestor.com This thread is intended to expose the rotten heart and immoral soul of Wall Street. All it has exposed thusfar is that those screaming the loudest have the least knowledge and experience; that this is a bear market with a decidedly retail flavor; that Madison Avenue shares as much "blame" as Wall Street for the wailing and gnashing of teeth; and that for a mostly insensitive guy, man, you get touchy about some things... Thank you for epitomizing the problem. How? By not letting anyone forget your incredibly callous, inhuman remark(s)? LP.