Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Palestine, facts and history -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (495)	6/23/2002 9:05:28 PM
From: lorne	Respond to of 770

You said...." There were policemen who were armed, but the 13 Palestinian fighters do not appear to have been armed.".... Thirteen palestinian fighters...and just why would fighters be unarmed.... that don't sound quite right. You said...." How can you try to draw an analogy to Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount? "..... What are you talking about now? Draw an analogy to what? You said.....and as usual trying to confuse the original question......." You can't seriously say that these Palestinians who were on the run from the Israeli army were trying to lay a claim to the Chruch of the Nativity.".... You are right about that, not only can't I say that but I at no time said that or implied that...show me where I said that? Others who read these threads can see that as you become trapped you try to confuse the issue by changing the subject so stop making your self look silly. Christians did not have a call to arms even after armed muslim terrorists took over their most holy site and I asked you if you thought muslims would have acted in this kind of civilized manner if armed Christians had taken over macca? Not a real tough question so why avoid an answer. If you can't answer for religious reasons ok. Just say you can't answer, or you don't know or just don't answer. But at least stop making yourself look ridiculous.