SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (2248)6/27/2002 5:43:54 PM
From: MSI  Respond to of 3602
 
LOL! Boy, that is for sure. I would argue it's the secrecy machinery throughout government that's the sand in the wheels that has derailed our democracy.

If everything were out in the open, I have no doubt true public servants would run, and our electorate would put them in office.

It should be illegal for any government money or officials to covertly influence the media.

With the FOIA defeated by Executive Branch machinations, we are going down a slippery slope, that can only end in sufficiently great disaster to change things.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (2248)6/27/2002 6:05:19 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3602
 
THE DAILY OUTRAGE: OMINOUS SIGNS THAT BUSH SEEKS TO END PUBLIC'S DEFENDER IN PG & E BANKRUPTCY

TP,

Re: If you've got the Supremes, most of Congress, the media, and the Executive branches, what else do you need?


How about a compliant Attorney General who willfully removes the public's best point person in bankruptcy proceedings?

sacbee.com

Ashcroft removes bankruptcy trustee
She's won praise and drawn fire for acting as the public's advocate in the PG&E case.
By Claire Cooper -- Bee Legal Affairs Writer
Published 2:15 a.m. PDT Wednesday, June 26, 2002
Linda Ekstrom Stanley, the no-nonsense official who has stood up against corporate giants in the Pacific Gas and Electric Co. bankruptcy case, has been removed from office two years before the end of her term under orders by U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft.

As regional bankruptcy trustee for eight years, Stanley has been the U.S. Justice Department's official watchdog over bankruptcy cases in Northern and Eastern California and Nevada.

She has acted aggressively as the public's advocate, particularly in the 14 months since California's largest utility filed for bankruptcy protection. She attempted to give the utility's ratepayers a voice in the process and opposed giving the utility an exclusive right to draft the plans for its future.

She said Tuesday that she was informed of her dismissal "out of the blue" in a phone call late last week. Ashcroft's written order, dated June 18, gave no reason, according to Stanley, who said she didn't know if the action was related to the PG&E case.

PG&E had no comment.

Dana Perino, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said other trustees have been replaced in the past year, but she was unable to say whether the vacancies occurred through resignation or dismissal. All trustees were informed when Ashcroft took office that "their positions would be reviewed as part of the normal course of business," she said.

No successor to Stanley was announced.

Some prominent members of the bankruptcy bar said the likely explanation was simply that Stanley is a Democrat in a Republican administration.

"Maybe there's some Republican that wants the job," said John Hansen, a former Stanley law partner.

However, Jack Williams, scholar in residence at the American Bankruptcy Institute, said, "This is the first trustee that I know of that has essentially been fired" since creation of the office.

Although the federal statute establishing the trustee's office gives the attorney general the power to replace any of the nation's 21 regional trustees, Williams said removing one "unless for fraud or embezzlement or things like that" contradicts the intent of Congress in giving trustees five-year terms, a year longer than the president's.

Williams, Hansen and others familiar with Stanley's work said she may have attracted negative attention by espousing the view that trustees should protect the public interest and not simply monitor the bankruptcy process.

She was "the most high-profile and vocal" advocate of that view in the nation, said Williams.

"That's new," he said, adding that "reasonable minds could disagree" on whether the statute allows a U.S. trustee to take on such a role.

In that debate, though, Stanley seemed to have the support of the bankruptcy judges in her area.

"Generally, my colleagues all agree she was doing what the office was designed to do," said U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali, who sits in San Francisco and presides in the PG&E case.

Montali said he sometimes solicited Stanley's recommendations and, while he disagreed with her responses at times, he believed she ran her office at "the highest level of professionalism and integrity." He declined to speculate about the effect of her departure on the PG&E case.

Gary Cohen, general counsel of the state Public Utilities Commission, said he "hoped and expected" the trustee's office would continue its active role. Stanley did a good job, he said, of raising issues when the commission held back because of concern that its legal immunity might be jeopardized.

The Utility Reform Network issued a statement calling Stanley's dismissal an apparent "political move that will benefit PG&E at consumers' expense."

Steven Felderstein, the state's outside counsel in the PG&E case, said Stanley "paid attention to the issues that she thought were going to be important," such as whether the public was well-represented.

Richard Heltzel, the bankruptcy court clerk in Sacramento, said Stanley raised the caliber of professionalism in the trustee's office and opened the office to new ways of doing things.

"I've loved the job," said Stanley. "I've tried to make a difference. I think I've changed the attitude that people have about the office of the U.S. trustee."

Her last day in office will be July 2. Stanley said she'll spend it in Montali's court, where a hearing is scheduled on 21 lawyer and accountant fee applications in the PG&E case. She has filed objections to scores of items, including pay increases of up to $125 an hour for one firm's lawyers.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Just politics? This one smells real bad.... :(

-Ray



To: TigerPaw who wrote (2248)8/22/2002 1:28:12 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 3602
 
Slow Pace of Enron Probe Yields First Results.

8/22/02
The Daily Enron

thedailyenron.com

When the Justice Department decided to get tough on domestic terrorists Attorney General Ashcroft warned suspects that he would not wait to build a terrorism case against them. The DOJ, he said, would be proactive, not reactive. "If you so much as spit on the sidewalk we will arrest you...," Ashcroft warned.

Since Ashcroft announced his get-tough-on-terrorists policy the authorities have arrested and detained hundreds of suspects on various charges other than terrorism. But, apparently the standard is different for corporate evildoers. While by anyone's figuring the damage suffered by the US economy because of corporate shenanigans has been in the hundreds of billions of dollars, only 19 executives have been charged so far. As of today, only one mid-level executive from the company that started it all, Enron, will plead guilty.

That executive is Michael Kopper, 37, who served as the executive assistant of Enron's CFO, "special purpose entity" wizard Andrew Fastow.

Under the plea deal Kopper will plead guilty to conspiracy to launder money and forfeit the $12 million he raked in for his part in the deals. Not to be left out, the Securities and Exchange Commission said yesterday it too would now file a complaint against Kopper charging him with securities fraud.

Meanwhile, Enron's Three Amigos, Kenneth Lay, Jeffery Skilling and Andrew Fastow, remain free and uncharged - much to the consternation of Enron shareholders and creditors who worry that the three maintain full control over the assets they acquired from Enron.

"These are individuals who have already shown both the talent and inclination for hiding assets offshore," said one creditor source. "With hundreds of millions of dollars in claims stacking up and the feds breathing down their necks you would have to be a fool not to believe that they are using this window of opportunity to shelter or hide as much of their ill-gotten gains as they can before someone freezes or seizes them."

But, rather than apply the kind of "out of the box" aggressive actions the DOJ justifies for terrorist suspects, its corporate crime investigations have stuck to traditional white-collar crime investigation methods that take months, even years to yield single indictments.

Not that they can't move faster when they want to. When the DOJ decided it needed to arrest some corporate scofflaw - any corporate scofflaw - to show it was on the job it promptly indicted former Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski - not for what he may have done wrong at Tyco, but for using high-priced art work to evade taxes. It will take months to unravel Tyco's inner workings but, in the meantime, Kozlowski - and his assets - will be tied up in court on the tax charges.

The theory goes like this: if a person is suspected of committing massive financial frauds logic tells you that they probably also could not resist easier to prove petty crimes - the financial equivalent of "spitting on the sidewalk." So, hit them there first, put them and their assets on ice and then you take all the time you need to figure out and prove how they pulled off the big capers.

The Kozlowski case proves they can do it when they want to. So, why don't they "want to" in the Enron case? Does anyone out there want to bet real money against the idea that Lay, Skilling and Fastow didn't fib on their taxes or lie in a business communication using a telephone (wire fraud) or the US Mail (mail fraud)? If so, step right up. I'll take your money

------------------------------------------------------
Quote of the Day

"To Wall Street, I say, look beyond the latest quarter. Punish those who rely on deception, rather than the practice of openness and transparency…. Today, American markets enjoy the confidence of the world. How many half-truths, and how much accounting sleight-of-hand, will it take to tarnish that faith?"

-SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, Sept. 28, 1998