Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (52380)	7/5/2002 5:31:19 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The best thing would probably for the full 9th to reverse the 3-judge bench. The longer this goes on, the more I think it might be interesting to see it play out longer than that. I'm on record as preferring that the bozo not have started this action in the first place, but now that the deed is done and the country has already erupted...

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (52380)	7/5/2002 7:06:05 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

That's the likely outcome, if the panel itself doesn't reverse itself on reconsideration. From a legal point of view, I think the decision was not only wrong, but also that the issue is de minimus and should have been dismissed when initially filed. De minimus non curat lex. (If my spelling is right -- my Black's is still packed away.)