SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Palestinian Hoax -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito who wrote (749)7/6/2002 12:58:13 AM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3467
 
Allen
re: There's a big difference between mentioning the development of hydrogen burning vehicles
you should read more, it helps - Hydrogen cells are in commercial production as of now.



To: Cogito who wrote (749)7/6/2002 9:04:54 AM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3467
 
<<Lastly, any energy policy that proposes that we rely more on coal is one which belongs in the nineteenth century. No matter how cleanly you can get it to burn it's still a horrific job getting it out of the ground and there's a finite supply of it.>>

Well call me and my neighbors old fashioned. Our electric co-op bought a coal field and are building a coal fired plant on the site. It will burn 50% cleaner than even proposed 2020 standards call for. The coal is laying right on top of the ground and is no harder to mine than moving dirt.

The US has enough coal to meet our electricity needs for 300 years. That energy money could be going to US miners instead of ME pockets.