Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (20883)	7/7/2002 9:45:47 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

<<Perhaps we should wait until Iraq comes to us?>> Well our own CIA says they have not engaged in terrorism for the last 10 years. <<United we stand. Divided we fall.>> OK I'll buy that. But why should we unite behind your opinion? Our response to 911 has demonstrated to the world that any nation that supports terror against us will be brought down. This deterrent is designed to prevent attacks....It seems to me that if we attack without provocation we shall lose any creditability we have gained. Many years ago America had a policy I'm sure are familiar with, MAD. At the time I thought it wuz nutz....But here we are....Terrorists don't care if they die but fat cat leaders of governments do. Thus I believe Saddam will behave. I also think that the consequences of an invasion could be disastrous.....Or not ..These are the Con's I understand there are pros as well.As I said I ain't made up my mind on this as yet. Just don't think we auta go off half cocked.