Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (52761)	7/9/2002 12:08:10 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The definition of establishment is actually pretty clear It is true that a religion (or a custom) can be "established" in a society numerous ways. The mere fact that a high majority of the populace practices a particular religion helps to establish it. The reference to a particular religion in government documents or proclamations and/or its practice in public places would certainly help to establish it. If you regard such matters as Constitutional issues ... how do you get around the fact that the Constitution does not speak against "establishing a religion" ? Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ... It speaks against making any laws respecting such establishment. When you say the definition of establishment is actually pretty clear -- What is the source of authority for the clarity, if it is not our Constitution?

To: Neocon who wrote (52761)	7/9/2002 12:10:07 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

In the case of the pledge, it may suffice to stand silent at the relevant part, or it may not. In any case, that is the issue, properly understood....... I'm glad you agree with me.