SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Quincy who wrote (21111)7/10/2002 5:09:28 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Easy to bloath with malloc, but who are in control of your pointers to whatever you allocated??

Cheezy (switzerland, the one with the holes) question, if the bloathing memory needs to
be defragmented, resources are really nothing left, not and also.

Impossible in C, as well as compatible C++, worked great in Fortran, Brew is still a huge questionmark.
(well, not really)

Without getting into the question what "support" supports.

Ilmarinen

Pfunny stuff, how some java stuff is really lousy under the Beast, maybe the same reason
they rewrote NT to slow it down on a AMD core??

As S100-Brad wrote "Dos is not done until XXX does not run"

Yes, I now the virus-beast is working hard on their bounds checks, although there has been
"a product" for that for a long time.



To: Quincy who wrote (21111)7/10/2002 5:13:12 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 34857
 
Please, memory-cheeze-puhleeze, ask why pointer, absolute nor linear, adress manipulation was not
easily allowed in Fortran??

Ilmarinen

One could do it, but it took some skill.