Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (272936)	7/10/2002 5:31:11 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Facts are there were no FACTS to make a case. The facts exonerate Bush even if Clinton's SEC did not.

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (272936)	7/10/2002 5:33:56 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

In a criminal proceeding, if prosecution is declined because you do not think you can make a case before a jury, you declare the subject "cleared". That is what happened with Hillary, for example: there was a prima facie case, and they could have gotten an indictment, but they did not think they would win at trial. Thus, the Office of the Independent Counsel declared her cleared. So yes, there is a basis for saying that Bush was exonerated, despite the language used by the SEC.......