Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chomolungma who wrote (168262)	7/15/2002 2:54:56 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"From an unbiased observer, I'll say that Ali Chen is ranting at being proven wrong by the facts. Sorry, that' just the way it looks to me." Take off the blinders. Ali is right. Jim

To: chomolungma who wrote (168262)	7/15/2002 3:39:01 PM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 186894

"I'll say that Ali Chen is ranting at being proven wrong by the facts. Sorry, that' just the way it looks to me." I appreciate your "unbiased" opinion, but would you care to elaborate which facts are being at consideration? The guy showed out some statistics that tells that homes in the area I live appreciate at 1% per year. I don't know what data he used, and don't give a shit. I _live_ in that area and pay property taxes. I gave a local official link that shows that local real estate taxes are at maximum capped value, even above 10% per year, even on average. And uncapped values, which are based on actual home sales, are much higher. These are my facts, as opposed to "1%" central statistics. So, unless you were just teasing me, by which "facts" I've being proven wrong? - Ali