SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pvz who wrote (15293)7/19/2002 8:02:55 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 23153
 
Some thoughts on Monday...

Fear, Loathing and Monday's Open
By Matthew Goldstein
Senior Writer
TheStreet.com
07/19/2002 06:21 PM EDT

It was an ugly Friday on Wall Street. It could get uglier on Monday, especially because investors, traders and fund managers have the weekend to sit and stew.

Obviously, no knows what will happen when trading resumes. And no one really knows whether Friday will finally be the much talked about but illusive thing called capitulation -- that one cataclysmic day of selling that finally slays the market bear.

The trouble is, we're in uncharted waters right now. Yes, valuations are still high on a goodly number of stocks, but what's driving this market right now isn't a concern about stock prices -- it's a fear about the numbers company's report. It's a complete breakdown of investor trust in Corporate America and Wall Street.

Indeed, it's not just fear that's driving investors, but utter distrust. And that's something that won't disappear over a weekend, or even a few days.

Lack of Precedent
"There's nothing common about what is going on," says Harold Schroeder, a portfolio manager for Carlson Capital, a Dallas-based hedge fund. "We have lost tremendous confidence in major institutions. And without confidence you have trouble investing in stocks. We've thrown fundamental analysis out the window."

If you're looking to history as a guide for Monday's stock action, the best place to turn is to the October 1987 crash. The infamous Black Monday selloff in 1987, when the Dow Jones Industrials fell some 22% on Oct. 19, was preceded by a 5% drop in the Dow Jones the previous Friday. For the entire week before Black Monday, the blue-chip index fell just over 9%.

And there are some parallels to today's sickening market action. Friday's 390-point tumble in the Dow translates into a 4.64% drop. For the week the Dow lost 7.7% of its value.

Past Performance, Future Results
But markets don't necessarily do what history predicts. Remember how everyone said at the beginning of this year that a third-straight down year for the major market indices would be unprecedented? Well, we're certainly heading in that direction.

And the problem is that telling investors stocks are cheap is not going to get them to buy, at least not right now.

"There is a disconnect between fundamentals and the stock market and stock prices," says Timothy Ghriskey, president of Ghriskey Capital Management, a Connecticut-based hedge fund. "My gut is we're in for some stabilization on Monday, but I've been looking for a bear market rally for a while."

One thing that won't help the market stabilize are things that breed more distrust. That's what one institutional trader said he saw happen on Wall Street just before the close Friday. The trader, who didn't want to be named, said specialists -- the firms that manage trading on the New York Stock Exchange -- were artificially trying to prop up in a handful of stocks that were being added Friday evening to the S&P 500. He acknowledged, however, he was holding short positions in some of those stocks.

The Little Guy Factor
What ultimately will tell the tale on Monday is how ordinary investors react to Friday's selloff. If investors view Friday as just another in a long string of bad days for Wall Street, Monday could be rather uneventful; indeed, stocks could rebound as investors smell a buying opportunity. Or investors might conclude that it's finally time to throw in the towel on some of the clunkers they're still holding in their portfolios from the glory days of the bull market.

"This is clearly mostly emotion," says David Kaslow, senior portfolio manager for Bank of America Capital Management's Nations Mid-Cap Fund. "It will be interesting to see when they go home this weekend, do they maybe pull the trigger and sell some things. We may need another big down day. (People) want some kind of mental bottom."

And even if there is another big selloff, it won't be the end of the world. Wise investors remember that after the October 1987 crash, the market rallied and the bull market was born soon after.

Oh, and if you want to look at historical trends, this one may cheer you up. The Dow closed Oct. 19, 1987 at 1738. This Friday it closed at 8019.

thestreet.com



To: pvz who wrote (15293)7/19/2002 10:23:41 PM
From: Warpfactor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23153
 
pvz,

I probably need to take a vacation on Monday and Tuesday and be disconnected from the world.
Just earlier this week my trading account boasted 40% YTD gains, now thats been cut in half. There is a not insignificant chance that I will go negative YTD on Monday or Tuesday. Such is the game that I am playing - high potential reward but high risk. Note to self - work on a lower risk, capital preservation strategy.

Probably the best thing would be for the markets to open down big Monday with a big reversal either Monday or Tuesday. Opening to the upside (and closing up) may be a setup for more grinding in the upcoming days and weeks.

Back to TRIN - here is data from last Sept. The righthand column being the close. As you can see, TRIN never got very high, even into the teeth of the post Sept 11 selloff. Which leads me to postulate that TRIN is more effective as an indicator in the earlier stages of a bear selloff when techs and other higher beta darlings are the first to go. But at the end of the selloff, Joe/Jane Sixpack are liquidating index funds which results in the modest daily TRINs. Any thoughts?

28-Sep-01 0.09 0.99 0.09 0.71
27-Sep-01 1.13 1.57 0.92 0.94
26-Sep-01 0.76 2.05 0.59 1.69
25-Sep-01 1.31 1.62 0.62 0.96
24-Sep-01 0.16 0.62 0.16 0.55
21-Sep-01 12.38 13.88 0.33 0.7
20-Sep-01 2.01 2.98 0.75 1.18
19-Sep-01 0.46 1.85 0.46 0.89
18-Sep-01 0.58 1.15 0.55 1.14
17-Sep-01 0.99 2.42 0.88 1.37
10-Sep-01 4.71 4.71 0.44 0.68



To: pvz who wrote (15293)7/19/2002 10:43:09 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23153
 
pvz, [text added] a Google search led to this PE chart lowrisk.com
You remember that low interest rates allow higher PEs.

<rant>I have long held that group PEs are BS. The poor companies drag the good ones down. But I never get anywhere with this opinion.</rant>

[added] I think it's a trailing PE because that is simple to do. To get it down the best companies have to get a haircut, or some of the worst have to be removed.

G.



To: pvz who wrote (15293)7/20/2002 11:04:45 AM
From: kodiak_bull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23153
 
PV:

Gottfried's chart helps a little:

lowrisk.com

To the extent you want to follow this exercise, I'd concentrate on the years 1976 to 1992, and try to rethink how interest rates moved then, the general mood of the country toward equities (and percentage of Joe SixPack who owned them, either directly (few) or through mutual funds), and then see how that compares with our internet-linked, low-commission, self-directed IRA, 401K economic landscape AND the lowest Fed funds rate in 40 or 50 years.

I think on the basis of that (appetite for and distribution of equities, and low interest rates) current p/e's (to the extent you trust something like an S&P p/e) do not need to fall much farther to be fair valued.

The investor's real question, given $10,000 to allocate, is does he put it into money markets for 1.5% return, short treasurys for 2.5%, 10 year treasurys for 4.5%, a "safe" dividend yielding stock for 4-5% plus/minus whatever, or pay 25 X trailing earnings for a shot at the American dream? Or await Monday's carnage/pop for another shot at the roulette wheel?

Kb



To: pvz who wrote (15293)7/20/2002 4:10:37 PM
From: augieboo  Respond to of 23153
 
PVZ, FWIW, this chart came from Barrons. I don't have a link to the original, because I got it from somebody else on SI. (Can't remember who.)

home.pacbell.net