Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (18235)	7/26/2002 8:24:47 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

LOL. Really. Yes really. For example, I think the steel tariff decision is transparently a political bone to the unions and he's a dope if he thinks unions are ever going to support him. If you can find examples of where I've canonized Bush, feel free to provide them. It amuses me intensely that you can write something like that and then deny that your estimates of character are related to ideology. The TP syndrome is alive and well. I also never said that character and ideology are totally unrelated. However, while I may be predisposed to look more favorably on persons whose ideology matches my own, that does not leave me incapable of seeing redeeming qualities in those of a differing political persuasion. I am insulted and deeply offended by any comparison to TreasonPuddy. I do not and would not post a continuous stream of libelous, bilious crapola and crackpot conspiracy theories unsupported by a shred of fact for a partisan political purpose, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE COUNTRY IS AT WAR. It is inexcusable, reprehensible and disgusting. No less disgusting the those who continue to minimize dand defend the excesses of the Clintons. An interesting hypothetical question, for people of all ideological persuasions: if you had a choice between a known scumbag whose opinions on policy matched yours and a saint whose political ideology you thought disastrous, for whom would you vote? In that case, I would vote for neither.