Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (18381)	7/28/2002 3:25:55 PM
From: theeleventhmuse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I am in favor of the word human. I am only in favor of humans who exhibit behavior that is beneficial to humanity. If however a race wants to be delineated by color, I think the color name should match the face color exactly. I have light skin, but I really don't know of anyone that is really white, expect for Geishas. I am light tan. I know blacks want to be called black, but they are all really different shades of brown unless they are covered from head to foot with black hair like a black cat or black lab, then they would qualify as black. I have never know what to call the other races that seem to have different shades of olive skin. And what about the races that have the same color of skin, but different features of the face. Lets call each person a human being and work with the person from that point of view. If that doesn't work, then ask the person where exactly on the color wheel they feel they fit and why and maybe we can understand them better then. If they are humans but not human, then kick the bums out.