SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/6/2002 10:01:55 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 74559
 
Having a Fields Day

If Fields really said ""you can't cheat an honest man.", then Fields never met the modern CEO...

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
More Fields.........

"I like thieves. Some of my best friends are thieves. Why, just last week we had the president of the bank over for dinner." --(The Barber Shop)

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
"I was almost put out of business by a well-meaning corpse."

--Possibly a premonition of Ashcroft's Lazarus routine?

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
"I'll be down in the front row with a basket of last month's eggs."

--Fields on Shareholder Meetings?

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
"...more people are driven insane through religious hysteria than by drinking alcohol."

--Excepting George Bush, looking for another Trifecta....

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
"Just looking for loopholes."

--George Bush, looking for another Trifecta....

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
"I admit I scanned it once, searching for some movie plots..." (but found) "only a pack of wild lies."

--George Bush on the EPA's global warming warnings....

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
I could go on. But I can't find the stage....



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/9/2002 10:28:38 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Hi CB, A second front on your ... Message 17854877

You are not taking in the entire hideous picture of an ugly tapestry of narrow selfish interest, even if at the cost of same convoluted self-interest.

By the US officialdom logic, a Uighur with a bomb on a bus in Xinkiang is a freedom fighter, but qualifies for Cuban jail without habeaus whatever if caught in Afghanistan.

China tried to cooperate for the supposed greater good, and was failed. Note the dates of the reports:

christiansciencemonitor.com

<<The report concludes that China itself may be involved in supporting the camps, either by tacitly allowing Islamic radicals of the ethnic Uighur minority in China's western Xinjiang Province to cross into Pakistan to join Al Qaeda, or overtly offering to provide Al Qaeda with antiaircraft missiles>>

stratfor.com

<<"Terrorism" Definition Testing U.S.-China Ties
14 December 2001

Summary

The Chinese government is calling for the United States to hand over ethnic Uighurs from Xinjiang province who were captured while fighting with Taliban forces in Afghanistan. Washington has thus far refused, as it does not recognize Uighur separatists as terrorists. For Beijing, this is a test case for Washington's stance that there are no good terrorists, and it may have broader implications for U.S.-Chinese relations.>>

stratfor.com

<<Chinese Cleanup Targets Uighurs
16 May 2001

Summary

Through the end of May, the Chinese government will target ethnic minorities in northwest China under an official cleanup program aimed for criminals and separatists. The targets are the region's ethnic Uighurs, a group marked by the Chinese government for having ambitions for an independent state. China's western frontier is secure for now, but Chinese forces are routing separatist influences across the border to protect strategic domestic interests>>

Chugs, Jay



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/9/2002 10:30:16 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Hi CB, this is what Washington has managed to get itself bogged down in:

stratfor.com

Afghanistan: Yesterday's Friends May Be Today's Enemies
8 August 2002

Summary

Unrest in eastern Afghanistan caused by rebel warlord Pacha Khan Zadran demonstrates Washington's precarious balancing act between tactical allies and strategic interests in the region. Tensions are becoming more acute, and the United States is caught in the middle.

Analysis

A week of demonstrations against Afghan President Hamid Karzai's government in the eastern province of Khost ended Aug. 6. Pushtun protesters there demanded that Kabul recall governors who were recently appointed to Khost and neighboring Paktia province and expressed their support for local tribal leader and rebel warlord Pacha Khan Zadran, who has twice tried to capture Paktia's capital.

The incident illustrates the limits of the central government in Afghanistan. Stability in Afghanistan is an anomaly: Ethnic and clan rivalries abound, and a loose confederation of local and regional rulers is what passes for order. Karzai's government is no exception.

The country's Loya Jirga council reaffirmed Karzai's interim government in June, after regional warlords who assisted Washington had carved out their own fiefdoms. Since then, the assassination in July of Vice President Haji Abdul Qadir, and Karzai's subsequent decision to replace his Afghan bodyguards with U.S. troops, demonstrate just how dangerous the business of politics is in Afghanistan.

Washington had no illusions about the severe factionalism in Afghanistan. That a strong central government is not quickly unfolding and internecine fighting is still the rule comes as no surprise. As far as the United States and Karzai are concerned, this is expected and even tolerable to a certain degree.

Immediately after Sept. 11, Washington needed Afghan allies that knew the terrain, had local contacts and intelligence and were willing to fight the Taliban and al Qaeda. Warlords like Ismail Khan, Abdul Rashid Dostum, Gul Agha Shirzai and Zadran were all invaluable in this sense.

In exchange for their services, it was understood that they would be allotted their share of the Afghan kingdom, and it was not unexpected that the competing warlords and local clans would fight amongst themselves to gain or protect turf. However, Washington hoped to at least manage the competing factions and prevent their hostility from interfering with operations while it conducted its war.

However, the refusal by Zadran to cease his attempts to assert power in the east and surrender to the government represents the first instance of Washington's Afghani allies coming into direct, sustained conflict. In this case, U.S. short-term tactical considerations have collided with a long-term strategy.

Zadran, a staunch supporter of the U.S. war against the Taliban and al Qaeda, so far has proven beyond Washington and Kabul's ability to handle. After Karzai's interim government appointed Zadran governor of Paktia province and head of the southern zone in January, he was prevented from taking the provincial seat by local tribal leaders who had little more than disdain for him and rejected his rule outright.

After Zadran tried to capture the provincial capital of Gardez and left scores dead in the bloodiest example of internecine fighting in Afghanistan so far, Karzai cut a deal with the local tribal leaders and replaced the problematic Pushtun leader.

Since then, Zadran and his brother Kamal -- the former governor of Khost -- have sought to take what Karzai would not give: Paktia and Khost provinces. Zadran's efforts have centered on rallying Pushtun ethnic sentiments and calling for the overthrow of Karzai's government, which he claims is overrun by the Tajik-dominated Northern Alliance.

As Afghanistan steadily slides into marginal anarchy -- competing factions cannot be separated, contained or policed by peacekeeping forces -- Zadran is fighting to take as large as piece of the pie as possible. However, Karzai cannot and will not allow a competing Pushtun leader to rise in the predominantly Pushtun-populated country, particularly in the eastern region -- the epicenter of Pushtun power.

Now the United States has been caught in the middle of clan warfare as it continues to carry out operations in the region. Within the past weeks there has been an upsurge in attacks on U.S. and Afghan government troops in eastern Afghanistan, including the ambush of U.S. troops in Khost at the end of July and the Aug. 7 attack on an army base in the Bagram district in Kabul.

Al Qaeda and Taliban forces may have perpetrated these attacks. However, human sources in Afghanistan's Defense Ministry have informed STRATFOR that they believe the guerrillas who attacked U.S. troops with missiles and machine guns Aug. 4 in Paktia in the Zawar region were Afghan Pushtuns, not foreign Mujahideens, indicating that the attack possibly was undertaken by disenfranchised Pushtuns upset with the United States and Karzai.



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/9/2002 10:32:44 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Hi CB, and this is what it is all about - continuation of the Great Game

stratfor.com

India Stepping Up Diplomacy in Central Asia
9 August 2002

Summary

India is stepping up ties with Central Asian nations, seeking to stake a claim in the region as U.S. influence there waxes and Chinese influence wanes. In the long run, as India expands its strategic horizons and positions itself as the main political, economic and military power in the Indian Ocean basin, it must ensure that its position in South and Central Asia is secure, and reaching out to the "Stans" is a key step.

Analysis

Indian Deputy Foreign Minister Rajendra Abhyankar paid a two-day visit Aug. 8 and 9 to Tajikistan, where he met with various officials, including Tajik President Emomali Rahmonov. The trip followed a visit by Kyrgyz President Askar Akayev to New Delhi, where he met with Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, among others.

India is expanding its contact with Central Asian states amid shifting political dynamics in the region. For New Delhi, an increased presence in Central Asia solidifies its position as a central player in the global war against terrorism and aids its longer-term goal of expanding India's regional political, economic and military influence as the country tries to become the dominant power in the Indian Ocean basin.

The past week has been a busy time for Indian diplomacy in Central Asia. During his visit the Kyrgyz president voiced support for India's inclusion in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, originally known as the Shanghai Five when China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan founded it. India has been quietly lobbying for membership in the group -- which now also includes Uzbekistan -- as a way of extending its political influence farther north and balancing China's involvement.

Since the start of the U.S.-led war against terrorism, China's position in Central Asia has rapidly waned as several countries have opened their doors to the United States. Now India is trying to ride in on the U.S. coattails and establish a position in an area vital to its security and energy interests. In addition to talks with Kyrgyzstan, India is engaging Tajikistan. During the deputy foreign minister's visit to Dushanbe, Rahmonov invited Vajpayee to Tajikistan.

New Delhi views Central Asia as a key link in its broader regional goals. Central Asian states are rich sources of energy, something India always needs, but they also are strategically located between China, Russia and Iran, three regional powers that India both competes and cooperates with. In the recent talks with Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, security issues and terrorism were top items, but economic links also were discussed, including Indian offers to help Central Asia develop an information technology industry.

New Delhi also is looking to Central Asia as a potential client for Indian heavy industry, and to be part of an expanded trade network. Already India, Russia and Iran have taken steps to establish the so-called North-South trade corridor, and India is working with Myanmar and Thailand to build a new highway system linking South and Southeast Asia.

But in the longer term, India needs to cement a strong position in Central Asia if it is to become a major regional power. While much of New Delhi's attention has thus far been focused on expanding its reach into Southeast Asia and developing ties with Iran and Middle Eastern states, Central Asia could become a clear buffer between India and other regional powers and may offer some strategic leverage in the country's ongoing competition with Pakistan and China.



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/9/2002 10:34:33 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Because all countries have ambitions:

stratfor.com

India Challenges China in South China Sea
26 April 2000

Summary

India intends to hold a series of bilateral and unilateral naval exercises in the South China Sea in October and November 2000, according to government sources cited by the Hindustan Times April 24. The decision comes amid debate within the Indian armed forces over the reshaping of naval forces and the expansion of their operational capabilities. By extending its area of operation firmly into the South China Sea, India presents a direct challenge to China, which claims the entire area as its territorial waters. This promises both a redefinition of the naval balance of power in the region, and an intensification of tensions between New Delhi and Beijing.

Analysis

During a recent Indian Naval Commanders' Conference, the Naval Operations Directorate announced plans for unilateral Indian navy exercises in the South China Sea later this year, according to government sources cited in the Hindustan Times April 24. The announcement comes amid debate within India's armed forces over the future role of the navy, including plans to increase its aircraft carrier force to three.

The decision to extend the reach and operational areas of India's expanding navy firmly into the South China Sea will not only trigger a reassessment of the balance of naval power in the region, but also risks a deterioration of Beijing-New Delhi relations as India encroaches into territory claimed by China.

India's navy intends to hold bilateral exercises with South Korea and Vietnam in October and November 2000. Following these exercises, four or five Indian vessels will remain in the South China Sea to be joined by an Indian Kilo-class submarine and reconnaissance aircraft for unilateral naval exercises.

The exercises fit within India's shifting definition of its naval areas of concern, as laid out by Defense Minister George Fernandes April 14 at the launching of India's latest warship the INS Brahmaputra. Fernandes said India's “area of interest … extends from the north of the Arabian Sea to the South China Sea.” The debate in New Delhi over the role of India's navy is apparently being won by those who wish to expand the operational capabilities of the navy and to increase attention to force projection and expeditionary forces.

India's spreading naval reach is in part to counter the growing threat of piracy on both sides of the Strait of Malacca. In November 1999, Indian navy and coast guard vessels recaptured a hijacked Japanese cargo ship after a 12-hour chase. The hijacking prompted Japan to consider increased financial and possibly naval support to patrol the areas around the Strait in cooperation with China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and South Korea. This in turn contributed to Fernandes calling Japan and Vietnam key strategic partners in anti-piracy operations.

However, while India-Japan ties remain constrained by Tokyo's ongoing attempts to mediate between India and Pakistan, ties with Vietnam have been improving since a 1994 visit of then Indian Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao to Hanoi and the signing of a defense cooperation agreement. More recently, India has re-embarked on a “Look East” policy, increasing military and economic cooperation with Vietnam and enhancing ties with other South East Asian nations, including Myanmar.

At the same time India is expanding its naval reach into the South China Sea, it is expanding its force structure as well. The 2000-2001 defense budget includes $940 million for the Navy, up from $835 million the previous year. Of this, 60 percent has been allotted to acquisition of weapons and modernization programs.

While India's single operational aircraft carrier, the INS Viraat, is under refit, there are plans to build a domestic carrier and acquire the re-fit Russian Kiev-class Admiral Gorshkov. Prior to the recent launch of the INS Brahmaputra, India also commissioned its third fleet tanker, adding to its blue-water capabilities. There are plans to launch six more warships in 2000. India's naval expansion also includes buying several Russian MiG-29 Ks to add to its naval air force.

India is also preparing to launch a Kilo-class submarine capable of ballistic missile launches, according to the Hindu. On April 10, India tested the Dhanush ship-launched ballistic missile, and there are plans to fit some of India's Kilo-class submarines with Russian Klub-class ballistic missiles.

The expanding navy presents a direct challenge to China. Beijing and New Delhi are already competing for control over the Andaman Sea, along the west coast of Myanmar leading to the entrance of the Strait of Malacca. On land, the border between China and India remains contested in two areas, and China's traditional backing of Pakistan continues to hinder the potential for improved relations.

The move to expand operations from the north of the Arabian Sea through the South China Sea and to establish an expeditionary-capable force not only threatens China's areas of operation but also alters the balance of naval power in the region. Further, plans for three operation carriers will make India equal to the United Kingdom and second only to the United States in carrier assets. Regionally, other carrier-capable navies have just one, including Russia and Thailand.

Currently in the Pacific, West Pacific and Indian Ocean, the only viable expeditionary naval force is the United States. While Japan has significant naval forces, it will be some time before it is capable of extensive expeditionary activities. In creating a viable blue-water reach, including refueling and support craft, India will significantly surpass China's naval capabilities as well.

For China, the threat of an encroaching Indian naval presence will further undermine any potential Sino-Indian reconciliation and cooperation. An India capable of placing a carrier force off Chinese shore - supported by submarines capable of ballistic missile launches - drastically changes the equation with regard to China's support for India's rival Pakistan. With Russia supplying much of the technology and hardware, Sino-Russian relations will also be strained.

India's plans stem from several sources - counter-piracy, protection of trade routes, balancing China and establishing itself as a world power rather than simply a regional power. China has two choices: tie down Indian defense spending on land-based assets by instigating tensions with Pakistan or, more costly, match India's naval expansion with its own.

China will likely follow both paths, increasing its own naval reach in the short term by focusing on the establishment and maintenance of forward bases in the Spratly Islands and Myanmar. As India pushes to redefine itself as an international naval power, friction and confrontation with China will become more volatile.



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/9/2002 10:35:33 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Without having to be enemies ...

stratfor.com

Japan, India Looking To Counter China
11 December 2001

Summary

Indian Prime Minister Atal Vajpayee began a five-day visit to Japan Dec. 7. In the short term, both countries hope increased cooperation will boost their respective economies. The meeting, however, is also part of a broad pattern of activity on the part of both New Delhi and Tokyo aimed at expanding their regional influence. China, their powerful neighbor, will eventually attempt to counteract the threat to its position.

Analysis

After arriving in Osaka Dec. 7 for a five-day visit, Indian Prime Minister Atal Vajpayee visited with his Japanese counterpart Junichiro Koizumi as well as the country's top business executives and foreign and finance ministers. Vajpayee's visit is the first to Japan by an Indian prime minister since 1992.

In the short term, New Delhi and Tokyo hope the visit will help strengthen cooperation between the two countries and boost their suffering economies. But economic considerations are part of a broader goal to broaden their roles in Asia and lower their dependence on the United States. However, China will do what it can to counteract the growing influence of its two neighbors.

Even amid their current slumps, Japan and India both carry a significant amount of economic weight. With their large populations, they present highly inviting consumer markets. Japan absorbs a large volume of exports from most Asian countries, and India does the same for many of its neighbors.

Economic cooperation would be especially beneficial as both countries have complimentary markets in the computer industry. India's command of the global software market is already significant and still rising. Indian information technology earned $8.67 billion from 1999 to 2000, up 50 percent from the year before, according to the National Association of Software and Service Companies. During the same period, software revenues comprised more than 65 percent of India's information-technology earnings.

Vajpayee urged Japanese businesses to take advantage of this market and gain access to India's copious high-tech human resources. Japan itself offers numerous advantages for Indian firms.

Japan's production of electrical equipment is among the largest in the world, with semiconductors its second-largest export, according to the CIA World Factbook. The country also exported more than $74 billion in electronics in the first nine months of 2001, according to the Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association.

Japan and India will likely use each other's strengths in their complimentary computer markets to ameliorate the weaknesses in their own markets.

The Japanese government already gave India an economic helping hand when it lifted sanctions against New Delhi in October. Tokyo established the sanctions in 1998 to protest India's testing of nuclear weapons. The lifting of the sanctions served as a reward for India's participation in the war against terrorism.

But greater economic ties and benefits represent only the short-term goals India and Japan hope to accomplish. Both countries intend to use their association to strengthen their roles in Asia and maintain that influence, especially as China increases its power.

Beijing's official entrance into the World Trade Organization Dec. 11 could allow its markets to dominate those of Tokyo and New Delhi. China's unpredictability and large military have also always presented a security threat to both countries. A growing alliance between India and Japan will allow them to counter China's regional dominance by presenting stronger opposition from multiple angles.

The two countries have already worked to assert more influence in the region. India held naval exercises in the South China Sea in 2000, presenting a direct challenge to China, which claims the entire area as its territorial waters. And Japan has stretched its area of defense to include the Strait of Malacca, more than 2,000 miles away.

Because of their geographic locations, both countries will not necessarily have to compete with each other for influence. India is looking to expand its role in Southeast Asia. This aim originated with its "Look East" policy of building more military and economic links with nations such as Indonesia and Vietnam. Japan is seeking to broaden its influence from Northeast Asia to Southeast Asia. Last year it gained access to Singapore's military bases.

Greater cooperation between India and Japan will also affect their relationships with the United States. Although India, especially in the past two years, has worked to build stronger ties with Washington, it does not want to become a minion of the global hegemonic power. Japan wants to maintain its friendly relations with the United States while still asserting more independence.

Many in the country are calling for a rewrite of the constitution framed by the United States at the end of World War II in order to allow Japan's armed forces more leeway to respond to potential threats. If India and Japan have each other as allies, they can reduce their dependence on the United States while still preserving good relations with Washington.

China, though distracted with its entry into the World Trade Organization, will attempt to combat India's and Japan's efforts. Beijing holds two trump cards over New Delhi and Tokyo: Pakistan and North Korea. The communist country carries weight in both smaller countries. China can easily increase tensions between Pakistan and India and between North Korea and Japan, endangering stability in their respective areas.

Due to this possibility, Japan and India will tread carefully and slowly as they cooperate more closely. If they can maintain momentum, however, they will likely see the fruits of their labor in greater economic and military cooperation with countries in Asia.



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/9/2002 10:39:07 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi CB, Enemies must be destroyed. Are you suggesting China must be destroyed? Chugs, Jay



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/9/2002 10:45:52 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Hi CB, or should China be splintered up like the USSR, so that its folks are made poorer, so that SUV-driving communism can thrive in California unchallenged? Chugs, Jay



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/9/2002 11:40:07 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi CB, Last thought on the issue ... I am supposing that you do not mean to turn China willy by the nilly into a India-type democracy where the vast majority gave up all hope for a better life?

Life is not simple, and governments can not sustain themselves indefinitely but for the continuing support of the majority of the people. Casting votes is one way to change government. Revolution is another way. To be decided by the locals, and only the locals.

Chugs, Jay



To: Ilaine who wrote (22244)8/10/2002 7:01:13 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Yup CB, Through skewed world view and twisted priorities, I can see that China is definitely the enemy that did not take WTC down:

online.wsj.com

August 12th, 2002

Big Changes Up Top, but No Upheaval, Await China
By LESLIE P. NORTON

Emerging Markets

In the coming months, something momentous will happen in China. One by one, its major leaders will resign, including President and Communist Party General Secretary Jiang Zemin, Premier Zhu Rongji and legislative chief Li Peng. At the same time, as many as five members of the powerful Politburo Standing Committee, including the three gentlemen listed above, may step down.

"This is not just a changing of the guard," says Cheng Li, a Sinologist at the Woodrow Wilson International Center in Washington, D.C., whose book "China's Leaders: The New Generation" was published last year. The new leaders "grew up during the Cultural Revolution," Li adds, and thus "have six important traits. They are disillusioned with ideology, and therefore are less dogmatic. Their political careers and affiliations are more diverse. They're more capable of dealing with challenges. They're more interested in balanced regional economic development and in a social safety net. They're more inclined to pursue reforms. And they're more arrogant in response to American 'arrogance.' "

In any other emerging market, a political shakeup of such magnitude might be preceded by a stutterstep in foreign investment. Yet until now, global investors were remarkably composed about the prospects for change. The collective calm owed to the widely telegraphed nature of the transition. Vice President Hu Jintao, 59, has been groomed for years to succeed Jiang, and has already met world leaders such as President Bush. Similarly Zhu, due to retire in March, will likely be succeeded by Vice Premier Wen Jiabao, 60. Observers have also reasoned that China's incoming bosses lack the personal magnetism and authority of previous leaders such as Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping. "The cult of personality is nowhere to be found," says Andy Rothman, China strategist at CLSA Emerging Markets in Beijing and a former U.S. diplomat.

That serenity vanished this month. That's when Taiwanese President Chen Shui-bian suddenly announced there was "one country on each side" of the 100-mile-wide Taiwan Strait, and that Taiwan ought to hold a referendum on its future. Beijing, of course, views Taiwan as a breakaway province. Uncertainty mounted. Would Jiang use Cheng's comments as a way to hang onto the presidency? Was Chen trying to right the balance as the U.S. courted China's support in its war against Iraq? Taiwan's Chen tried to repair the damage, and nobody expects a replay of 1996, when China conducted missile tests. Yet the verbal fracas took its toll. Last week, Taiwan and Chinese shares spiraled lower, even as markets elsewhere around the world advanced smartly. Hong Kong edged fractionally higher.

Rumors that Jiang was loath to retire and a perceived delay in the scheduling of the 16th Party Congress -- some observers now expect it to be held in November, not September -- also fueled the doubts. Thus, last week Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi considered shelving his September visit to China, ostensibly because of Chinese criticism over his visit to a Tokyo shrine that honors war criminals, but also because of uncertainty about the leadership change in the People's Republic. Other delays are in the offing. One consultant to publicly traded companies that are majority owned by the People's Republic confides that since many senior managers are party members, clients have suspended major corporate decisions until after the Congress.

If Jiang doesn't resign two of his three positions -- president, party chief and chairman of the military commission -- it may be a sign of conflict within China's leadership. But for now, China-watchers expect the transition to proceed as expected.

It will certainly be a peaceful change, unlike the last two, which were tainted by the Cultural Revolution and Tienanmen Square. China today is a different place, home to a large and vocal middle class more interested in hiking living standards than in ideology. They're more educated, with access to the Internet, and not just official newspapers, for news. Cheng Li of the Wilson Center found that in 1978, 30% of ministers had college degrees. The number is nearly 100% today. And with more than 60 million retail brokerage accounts in the People's Republic, as many Chinese play the market as belong to the Communist Party.

Hu is a bit of a cipher -- picked by the late supreme leader Deng Xiaoping in the early 'Nineties to succeed Jiang and, though not necessarily a Jiang protege, bearing Jiang's endorsement. He is reportedly a coalition builder. He's also perceived as appealing to younger Chinese, having worked in the party's youth league for more than a decade. Hu was chosen by the party to address the populace in a widely publicized TV speech in 1999 after the NATO forces accidentally bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. The speech expressed nationalistic sentiment while quelling public urges to vent those feelings. He has cultivated a low profile. Says Li of the Wilson Center: "It's unwise for him to be in the spotlight too much while Jiang is in charge." Nor does Hu wish to be viewed as "a pro-reform, pro-American figure" as China adopts capitalism. "The Chinese don't want to follow Soviet-style shock therapy, which is 'all shock, no therapy.' "

Meanwhile, Wen Jiabao, who's likely to succeed Premier Zhu, is a geologist who gained popularity with the Chinese when he coordinated relief efforts after the disastrous floods of 1998. He's regarded as a superior administrator and legendary survivor who has worked for a number of bosses who lost power in party purges, such as Hu Yaobang. One reason for his longevity: "He's not obsessed with factional politics and can get things done," says Li. In fact, Wen embodies the characteristics of the new generation: He's a skilled administrator instead of a hero of the Long March.

There's plenty to tackle. On the financial front, Chinese market regulators need legislative help to lure foreign investment, shrink the size of the state sector, deregulate the market for domestic investors and crack down on abuses. The biggest economic issue facing Hu is the need to reform a teetering banking system with sufficient sensitivity that new loan flow doesn't generate sour loans at the same rate.

The new leaders will want to boost development of the impoverished interior, bolster the legal system, institutionalize local elections and resolve the future of the People's Liberation Army. Then there's the ongoing war against corruption, variously estimated to cost China between 1% and 4% of gross domestic product annually. "China isn't Suharto's Indonesia, but corruption affects the legitimacy of the party," says CLSA's Rothman.

For now, the betting is that Jiang will quit both as head of state and as party secretary, though he may hang on for a while as chief of the military commission. After all, he's eager to cement his legacy -- which includes obtaining the 2008 Olympics for China, entering the World Trade Organization and broadening party membership to include entrepreneurs. An unseemly transition could threaten that.

The WTO itself reduces the potential for great upheaval, since it institutionalizes China's trade relationships. Investors and trading partners are betting that China can't afford to move in a more protectionist direction. Says Jun Okumura, a top official with the Japan External Trade Organization, a division of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry: "The fact that Jiang has brought China into the WTO greatly diminished any uncertainties we would have felt from the changing of the regime."

What about Taiwan? Whatever the political scenario, it's clear that economic integration is proceeding between the Mainland and the island. And while some are betting that value is building up in Taiwan -- the Taiex is off 52% from its 2000 high -- BCA Research is recommending investors stay cautious on Taiwan, focus on the cheapish "B"-share market in China, and be overexposed to Hong Kong financials on expectations of a Fed rate cut.

Still, the deepening economic ties between the adversaries may mean the political risk is overstated. Don Gimbel, the international specialist at value investing firm Carret & Co., says: "Weakness in their markets is truly a buying opportunity. I do believe that good value can be bought for the long run on pullbacks such as we have seen recently. These are very smart people who understand long-term benefits of working together. As in all markets, quality always wins."