SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (60812)8/7/2002 10:07:08 AM
From: hueyone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77400
 
Everyone wants companies to expense them, but no one is arguing to have them come off taxable income.

Woops. Have you ever noticed that not so insubstantial "tax benefit from exercise of stock options" item on many companies' cash flow statements? Well, that item is a result of companies expensing stock options on their tax returns provided to the IRS. The entire point of the Levin/McCain bill, (which was killed by the tech lobby), was to require companies to present a consistent set of books to both shareholders and IRS. In other words, companies would only be able to claim an expense to the IRS for stock options exercise if they were also claiming the same expense on their reports to shareholders.



To: GraceZ who wrote (60812)8/7/2002 10:28:34 AM
From: Threshold  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
Agreed. The numbers of options granted especially to senior officers has become excessive. The tax issue needs balance, as the whole issue of expensing options is to remove an imbalance in the reporting of profits. Can't just leave something hanging in mid air.