SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (37455)8/13/2002 2:27:18 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Debka said that China was going to invade Afghanistan, and that Saudi Arabia had massed troops on the Jordanian border (implying that Saudi Arabia was going to invade Jordan). These were simple Israeli fantasies.

The first was a prediction that didn't materialize, not reporting. If the second report was a fantasy, then it was a fantasy shared by Stratfor, who also reported Saudi divisions near the Jordanian border. Neither source said anything about an invasion. Debka reported the Saudis only had about 10,000 men on the border, if memory serves. You don't invade anything with so few men; it was just a show of force. I repeat for the umpteenth time, in my opinion Debka's reports generally pan out. Their predictions are much more hit and miss.

But I've read the recent transcripts from Rumsfeld at the DoD web site, and I think that there is no significant military operations going on in Iraq.

If Baghdad falls to Special Forces ops, are you going to say that doesn't count? Wait and see. -g-



To: Bilow who wrote (37455)8/13/2002 7:25:21 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
If there's going to be big operations in Iraq (not piddly covert stuff that's been already going on for most of a decade), it will have to show up in the mobilization figures.

Unless the troops were already mobilized and we just assumed they were going to Afghanistan.



To: Bilow who wrote (37455)8/13/2002 10:09:47 AM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 281500
 
Completely agree. Debka can be accurate, but is often out in left field. Unfortunately, there is no sure way to separate its good stuff from the unreliable. Accordingly, it has to be taken with a dose of salt.

Good post.