Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (149609)	8/13/2002 6:47:58 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580052

The reality is that Clinton did nothing to help or hurt the economy. Bush did nothing to help or hurt the economy. Bush 41 did nothing to help or hurt the economy. Economic cycles happen. I took a number of advanced eco. classes and disagree with your premise. You don't have to agree with me but you can accept we disagree on this subject like we do with everything else. In the meantime you'd better hope that I am right and you are wrong because otherwise the Bushes could turn out to be two time losers in the second term category.

To: i-node who wrote (149609)	8/13/2002 11:29:50 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580052

Re: The reality is that Clinton did nothing to help or hurt the economy. Bush did nothing to help or hurt the economy. Bush 41 did nothing to help or hurt the economy Nonsense. Bush the elder courageously went about repairing the damage done by Reagan, who shattered the nations financial condition with horrific deficit spending. Clinton showed similar courage by maintaining the prudent, if somewhat painful policies established by the first Bush. Bush the younger stalled the economy by pre-announcing his awful economic policies then tanked it completely by doing what he said he'd do.