Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (38079)	8/16/2002 9:52:14 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

No, the ultimate arbiter of that debate would have been the membership of the Supreme Court in the 80s. Got your decades wrong, CB. I had anticipated your reply would be something on the order of Reagan would not ask for Supreme Court review because the members of his administration assumed he would lose, given the membership on the court. Which is how we decide, unfortunately, given the membership right now, what is constitutional. We let them (s)elect presidents.