SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Berk who wrote (2490)8/17/2002 9:43:54 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25522
 
Hi Dick,

It has always been my intention to learn some TA much more in depth than I currently do. Because I have always considered myself an investor and not a trader, I never really felt it necessary to understand the "voodoo" art. I have always said that using historical price to attempt to forecast future prices is the equivalent to using last weeks weather to see if it will rain tomorrow; not very logical. I stand by that comparison even now. However, there is one big(HUGE) difference between the two. If enough traders who follow TA trade using it and sell when a stock breaks a moving average simply because it has broken that trend line, they can essentially forecast tomorrows weather as rain. I have only really had this lesson hammered home to me during the past 27 brutal months of being an investor.

Regards,

Brian



To: Berk who wrote (2490)8/17/2002 10:30:13 AM
From: Cary Salsberg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25522
 
RE: "BTW Zeev understands the fundamentals of this and a variety of other industries far, far better than most investors."

I am a Zeev fan and I intend no disrespect, but the statement above does not indicate that he "understands the fundamentals" well enough for it to be useful as an investment tool.