Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jcky who wrote (38812)	8/20/2002 3:10:34 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 281500

We have been speaking of China lately. I see they are still up to the same old tricks. Daily Brickbat Absurd news bites, served fresh every day. By Charles Oliver China's Many "Cults" (8/20) China has sentenced three Roman Catholic priests to three years in a labor camp for "cult" activities it says threaten social stability. China has used cult laws, passed as part the government's fight against banned spiritual movement Falun Gong, to ratchet up its crackdown on Christians and Muslims outside the state-approved religious bureaucracy.

To: jcky who wrote (38812)	8/20/2002 10:38:39 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

This is a rather odd collection of criticisms, jcky. On the one hand, the policy has been "hijacked by ideologues", on the other, the image is "confused, unfocused and awkward"? Generally, when a policy has been hijacked by ideologues, it is going in a very definite direction, no confusion at all. It's just not a direction you agree with. As we see here. The main charge seems to be that the Bush administration did not sufficiently consult with 'the Wise' -- the diplomats, the generals, our allies -- before going public. Maybe so. On the other hand, maybe they knew perfectly well what their response would be, and knew an end run would be necessary. Since the discussion has now shifted from 'whether' to 'when', seems they had a point. The mission has been defined, the coalition will follow after. As opposed to collecting the coalition first, and defining the mission as the lowest common denominator of what the coalition will accept. As for the leaks, I incline to the school that says the first was a real 'oh my gosh, lock up the son of a bitch who leaked this'; the rest are disinformation designed to cover the first. Who needs an Office of Strategic Initiative when you have the New York Times?