SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (39255)8/21/2002 2:53:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
<<-He thinks the stated goals should be 'No Nukes for Saddam', not regime change, so we don't set a 'wild West' sort of precedent>>

Yup...Kissenger emphasized that MORE THAN ONCE....He also said he was not sure it was essential to go to war...He was clearly NOT in favor of unilateral intervention...He did distinguish his position from what he thinks Scowcroft is advocating...And of course he did not reveal what he and Powell discussed in their recent meeting together...=)



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (39255)8/21/2002 2:58:44 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Sounds like Kissinger is saying, vis a vis, debates, that rather than hang them before we have a trial, let's hang them after it.

K says you can have a short period for inspections, then we'll go in; K says you can have a short period for debate, then we'll go in.

If Bush follows that advice on consulting with allies and the country, he deserves a one term presidency.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News