SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael M who wrote (55514)8/28/2002 12:30:25 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
You realize that those stats on funding only take into account government funding, right?

If you adjust for private and community sources of funding the numbers become more interesting. You also need to take into account the desperate decay of infrastructure in DC and other poor districts- old buildings are money sinks, and much of the money that should go to students is spent trying to repair buildings. On top of that, in poor areas schools are attempting to compensate for parents who are not able to give their kids laptops, and books, and food.

Of course you could ignore all that. But it wouldn't give you an accurate picture of what the numbers mean, or what is needed to help the students in those areas. I really suggest you read Jonathing Kozol's book "Savage Inequalities". If you are interested in this subject at all, you owe it to yourself to read the book.



To: Michael M who wrote (55514)8/28/2002 12:49:35 AM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 82486
 
Some years back Utah was a quarter way from the bottom in funding- -and 4th from the top in scores.

And no excuses about decaying inner cities need apply.