SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (170218)8/28/2002 12:30:55 PM
From: NITT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan,
Get off your horse. If the BAPCO results are factually wrong that is one thing, but if what is documented in the testing is indeed correct regardless of which function BABCO chooses to test, then no fraud has occurred. All companies try to get their product to show best in benchmarking whether it is their own benchmark or a third party benchmark, or in the case of BABCO, a company that was founded and is heavily influenced by a few companies including Intel. They will also try to "sell" people on why this is a refection of the real world.

I remember the old saying "lies, damn lies, and benchmarks" from many years ago. The only thing that has changed in the last 30 years is that companies do a much better job of documenting the details behind the benchmark that allows people much smarter then the average consumer to dig into things.

AMD's rating system appears to be more misleading to the average retail consumer since it might be easy to confuse their modelhertz with megahertz. I think Cyrix ran into this. I'm sure AMD has a disclaimer on their boxes and in their literature. I doubt FTC would ever take action because consumers probably don't care enough, and AMD's pockets are way to empty.

On the other hand, class action lawyers may choose to go after Intel even if a case has no merit just because Intel does have $$$ and does create press for the class action industry.

Nitt



To: Dan3 who wrote (170218)8/28/2002 4:30:36 PM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 186894
 
Dan,

from the past....

Message 16298395

P4 is total fraud, and so are Intel's crooked benchmarks. Example - Athlon is faster than P4 in most Photoshop operations but Bapco (the bribe-me-please company) focuses on one rarely used operation P4 does well on to make up a major part of its benchmarks.

Great piece of work thanks to you and others uncovering this mess.

Steve

ps
Did pAUL and company get wind of this?