Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (56052)	8/30/2002 11:35:07 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

Gosh, the Good Old Days have returned to Beanie Babies! It gives you the same warm nostalgic feelings that one might have for the Depression, Slavery, or the Bubonic Plague.

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (56052)	8/31/2002 12:04:47 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

What the hell are you talking about? Where would enormous legal expenses come from? Let's say CH sued to get his full posting privileges restored. Do you envision this as a case that is going to the U.S. Supreme Court? Do you imagine that Alan Derschowitz, Barry Scheck, and Johnnie Cochran are going to become involved? Do you see the case dragging on for years, going from one courtroom to the next? Do you think CH would be awarded millions of dollars? (The only way CH would get a dime would be if he was proved right, and you wrong). Have you had to pay a lawyer lately JCD??? The expense of getting to judgment alone can be enormous in all but the most simple of cases....

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (56052)	8/31/2002 2:10:01 AM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Let's say CH sued to get his full posting privileges restored. Language-use can be so entertaining. "To get his full posting privileges restored" sounds so much better, doesn't it, than "threatened to sue to be able to continue his manifest sexual fixation on, harassment of, sexual innuendo about, threats to reveal private information about, a female poster suffering from PTSD who, he knew, was freaking out (that was most of the fun of it for him, I imagine) and had begged and begged him to leave her alone, and whose husband, who was witnessing the effects, had done the same"? CH is scum. (IMO!) He's has a filthily dishonest mind (IMO!), he's a slanderer and a bully and because he's a lawyer with not much to do and can, he threatens individuals and companies with expensive nuisance lawsuits; and because here there are willing enablers like you to give him moral support instead of discouraging his disgusting habits, he can slander and harass at little social cost. How nice for him! There are always types who are perversely attracted to that sort of individual. IMO CH has fortunately been so thoroughly exposed as a lying slimeball that his slandering-and-threatening proclivities will have to be reigned in from now on. And his revolting history here is most satisfyingly and thoroughly documented. Neither your nor his obfuscating word-choices 'disappear' it. Speaking of slimeball, do I have it right that CH is now referring to his slander of me and "sadistic porn" as "a play on words"? LOL! Perfect CH, for you CH-partisans. "A play on words." The man is a living corrupt lawyer-joke and you buy the package and try to sell it, too. All the above is IMO, of course!!